Search for: "JACKSON v. US " Results 4401 - 4420 of 5,429
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jul 2010, 7:47 am by Michael Webster
Michael Millerick, correctly in my opinion, notes that the passage of the Fair Arbitration Act which bans mandatory arbitration in franchise agreements is more likely to pass because of the Supreme Court (US) decision in Rent-Center v Jackson, which allowed the arbitrator to take jurisdiction over the question whether there was an agreement to arbitrate or not. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 3:58 am
However, the unanimous Court concluded that the employer’s tortious interference claim against the Teamsters was not cognizable under Section 301 of the LMRA (June 24, 2010).Rent-A-Center, West, Inc v Jackson (Dkt No 09-497). [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 12:52 am by 1 Crown Office Row
” The full hearing came before Lord Justice Carnwath, Lord Justice Jackson and Mr Justice Hedley. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 12:00 am by Sex Offender Issues
The People correctly concede the error, but urge us to remand the matter for further proceedings. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 9:46 pm by Steve Bainbridge
As Richard Epstein explained some years ago in connection with the Supreme Court's decision in Rapanos v. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 6:11 am by Henry Sommer
Jackson, again permitting the use of mandatory arbitration clauses to keep claims out of the court system, also shows us how far we need to go in the courts. [read post]