Search for: "L & I" Results 4401 - 4420 of 36,324
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Oct 2021, 8:19 am by Bridget Crawford
I added additional or deleted very few names myself, based on law prof accounts that I have happened to encounter (typically because they follow me on Twitter or I follow them) or if I knew someone had changed schools, left the academy, etc. [read post]
16 Oct 2021, 9:21 am by admin
The essence of a failure-to-warn claim is that (1) a manufacturer knows, or should know, about a harmful aspect of its product, (2) which knowledge is not appreciated by customers, (3) the manufacturer fails to warn adequately of this known harm, and (4) the manufacturer’s failure to warn causes the plaintiff to sustain the particular harm of which the manufacturer had knowledge, actual or constructive. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 6:37 am by Jennifer Davis
I wanted to learn more about the person whose case defined one particular aspect of the U.S. criminal justice system. [read post]
14 Oct 2021, 10:02 pm by JP Sarmiento
Our firm prepared and filed the I-130 Petition and I-485 Adjustment of Status Application on February 2, 2021. [read post]
14 Oct 2021, 11:08 am by John Elwood
§ 841(a)(l) as defined in United States v. [read post]
14 Oct 2021, 9:44 am by David M. McLain
Soon after L&J’s announcement, Dave Higgins, one of that firm’s senior partners, inquired as to whether I would be interested in starting a new firm focused on supporting Colorado’s construction industry and its insurers. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 12:57 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
  I guess I might go with The Notbel Prize henceforth. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 9:08 am by Kyle Persaud
In this post, I’ve assembled a collection of laws on false imprisonment in states throughout the U.S. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 9:08 am by Kyle Persaud
In this post, I’ve assembled a collection of laws on false imprisonment in states throughout the U.S. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 8:03 am by Eugene Volokh
It is a fundamental principle of First Amendment jurisprudence that the "[l]isteners' reaction to speech is not a content-neutral basis for regulation. [read post]
At issue was the adequacy of the hazards analysis evaluating whether the bridge replacement project would: (i) “impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan,” or (ii) “expose people or structures, either directly or indirectly, to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving wildland fires. [read post]
At issue was the adequacy of the hazards analysis evaluating whether the bridge replacement project would: (i) “impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan,” or (ii) “expose people or structures, either directly or indirectly, to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving wildland fires. [read post]