Search for: "Leaders v. State" Results 4401 - 4420 of 7,104
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jan 2023, 7:35 am
This is elaborated a little more in the abstract: Pix credit hereABSTRACT: When the leaders of the United States and of the Peoples Republic of China refer to human rights, they invoke entirely different conceptions. [read post]
11 Feb 2022, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
So far, the decisions have validated the party’s state-by-state legal strategy and offered a reprieve from several Republican gerrymandering attempts before a single election could be held under the new lines. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 6:01 am by Administrator
The Chronic Failure to Control Prisoner Isolation in US and Canadian Law Lisa Kerr, Assistant Professor, Queen’s University Faculty of Law(2015) Queen’s Law Journal, Vol. 40, No. 2, 482-530 Excerpt: Introduction, Sections II & V[Footnotes omitted. [read post]
23 May 2022, 8:55 am by Laurence H. Tribe
That was the clear message of the Court’s recent decision in Bostock v. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 9:25 am by Anushka Limaye
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
11 Jan 2014, 5:58 am by Yishai Schwartz
In Part V, Ben largely embraced the PRG’s recommendation that only high-level decision-makers should make the sensitive decision to spy on foreign leaders. [read post]
6 Sep 2014, 6:55 am by Benjamin Bissell
On Friday, Zoe Bedell summarized the recent decision of the European Court of Human Rights on extraditions to the United States: Trabelsi v. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 12:41 pm by South Florida Lawyers
The United States Supreme Court has further sanctified anonymous speech in an honest and open society through decisions including McIntyre v. [read blog]
23 Aug 2011, 12:41 pm by South Florida Lawyers
The United States Supreme Court has further sanctified anonymous speech in an honest and open society through decisions including McIntyre v. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
ABlawg.caEighty Percent Of Success Is Showing Up: Or “How A Pro Se Farmer Won A Default Against The United States In His Suit To Invalidate The Permit For Half Of Keystone Xl (& Why It Probably Won’t Last)”Case commented on: Bishop v Bostick, 9:13-cv-00082, (E.D. [read post]