Search for: "Light v. United States"
Results 4401 - 4420
of 11,307
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Mar 2013, 11:00 am
Porpoise Evans Currently before the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 1:30 pm
You can, if you are interested, read more about the United States’ Federal Sentencing Guidelines in the Wikipedia entry you can find here.Guillotte made two arguments on appeal and the Court of Appeals addressed then in what seems to have been the order in which he articulated them. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 9:53 am
In United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 3:00 am
Yesterday, the United States Supreme Court granted review in United States v. [read post]
11 Dec 2024, 2:25 am
in Kohler v West End 84 Units LLC 2024 NY Slip Op 34215(U) November 26, 2024 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 654985/2023 Judge: Lyle E. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 4:04 am
This case may shed further light on that outcome. [read post]
15 Jan 2025, 12:32 pm
The Supreme Court applied the approach articulated in Bruen in United States v Rahimi (Rahimi). [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 10:31 pm
Davis On Remand from the United States Supreme Court 08a0290p.06 2008/08/13 Beuke v. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 1:57 pm
United States v. [read post]
23 May 2025, 5:16 pm
What matters is whether the entity is doing so under the auspices of the President of the United States. [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 7:23 am
The question in this case is whether the United States (specifically, the U.S. [read post]
4 Nov 2007, 7:13 am
Inc. 4743 East Northern Lights Boulevard Anchorage, AK 99508 Phone: (907) 337-7678 (V/TTY); (800) 478-7678 (Toll Free in AK only) Fax: (907) 337-7671 E-mail: parents@parentsinc.org Web: http://www.parentsinc.org Developmental Disabilities State Developmental Disabilities Planning Council Governor's Council on Disabilities & Special Education P.O. [read post]
14 May 2020, 3:41 pm
California Expands Employee Privacy Rights & Insights from the Office of Attorney General, the CCPA is one of the most significant pieces of privacy legislation in the United States. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 5:21 am
First, section 1332(d) is a self-contained unit. [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 8:51 am
The Court also criticised the fact that residential units had been built within the boundaries of the flood plain and that construction occurred even after the 2001 flood. [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 1:11 pm
As to any remaining basis which defendants have presented in the instant matter, the United States Supreme Court has clearly concluded that Congress did not intend the preempt state-law failure-to-warn actions.Slip op., 2009 WL 635415, at *3. [read post]
16 Feb 2007, 5:38 am
Case Name: Dettloff v. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 3:51 am
United States, which stems from the “Bridgegate” controversy in New Jersey and involves the extent to which federal fraud statutes cover the politically motivated acts of public officials. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 10:17 am
This morning, in a 5-3 decision (Sotomayor recused herself), the United States Supreme Court issued a pro-arbitration decision in American Express Co. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 12:56 pm
United States v. [read post]
