Search for: "Likely v. State"
Results 4401 - 4420
of 82,323
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Sep 2018, 9:46 am
The post Wine Spectator v. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 1:02 pm
Supreme Court—South Dakota v. [read post]
12 May 2025, 12:34 pm
Turns Out That He Likely Can appeared first on Reason.com. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 4:45 am
Like the court in Brown v. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 7:13 am
He liked fucking [Betty] better. [read post]
15 Nov 2006, 5:31 am
State, but the COA disagreed.The state had a PR granted in State v. [read post]
31 May 2021, 7:51 pm
The New York Court of Appeals’ 2012 opinion in Pappas v Tzolis, decided in the wake and spirit of that court’s rulings the year before in the Centro Empresarial v America Movil and Arfa v Zamir cases, raised the bar for claims of fraud and breach of fiduciary duty brought by non-controlling shareholders and LLC members in connection with buyout transactions. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 8:35 pm
Mullen v. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 8:00 am
If, as I suspect, Trump’s election means that more states are going to act like Arizona, then there are dark days ahead — for all of us. [read post]
27 May 2022, 7:49 am
Salesforce and A.B. v. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 1:32 am
Dep’t of State Revenue v. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 7:32 am
Dep’t of State Revenue v. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 12:28 pm
In his opinion for the majority in Jones v. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 5:05 am
Qualcomm this year) may even find it highly dissuasive.Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, who is presiding over the Epic Games v. [read post]
29 Apr 2025, 2:29 pm
The Supreme Court of Appeal delivered judgment today in East Asian Consortium v MTN Group. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 6:05 pm
As we know, under the due process clauses of the New York State Constitution, Article I, § 6, and the United States Constitution, Fourteenth Amendment, evidence of a pretrial identification of the defendant is inadmissible if the procedure used is “unnecessarily suggestive” (Neil v Biggers, 409 US 188 [1972]; People v Adams, 53 NY2d 241 [1981]; People v Owens, 74 NY2d 677 [1989]; People v Farraro, 144 AD2d 976 [4th Dept 1988]). [read post]
3 May 2012, 8:58 pm
Sweeping statutes like Section 229 are in deep tension with an important structural feature of our Government: “The States possess primary authority for defining and enforcing the criminal law. [read post]
23 May 2007, 6:13 pm
The new case, State v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 9:54 am
(Gratz v. [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 5:04 pm
Only in Idaho.P.S. - The fake identification actually sounds like it was pretty well done. [read post]
