Search for: "MAY v. US " Results 4401 - 4420 of 120,359
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2018, 12:23 pm by Anthony Gaughan
In his Slate piece this morning, Rick Hasen even speculated that Kennedy may be signalling his retirement in his Trump v. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 4:30 am by Barry Sookman
Computer and Internet Law Updates for 2015-02-01: Zebra Stripes and Polka Dots May be Protected by US Copyrigh… http://t.co/B31mMWV4Fd -> blogged: Computer and Internet Law Updates for 2015-02-01 http://t.co/mBkcXYhy6s -> Internet justice: Mosley v Google http://t.co/2Efdcw58eZ -> Internet justice: Mosley v Google: In the landmark ruling in Google Spain SL, Google Inc. v Agencia Española d… http://t.co/GzQnkux7VD -> A… [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 1:01 am
iStock_000000100546_L2.jpg The First Circuit explains the circumstances in which an undercover agent may give lay testimony "as to the meaning of code words or phrases" concerning drug quantities based on the agent's "undercover drug buys"; noting as one factor whether the witness's lay testimony "corresponds" to undisputed facts, in United States v. [read post]
15 May 2014, 11:40 am
This moggy has been kept busy over the last 24 hours with matters of partiality at the EPO, Swiss form claims, and Bolar exemption in UK and under unitary patent, and then, no sooner was he thinking of emerging from the deluge, fellow Kat Annsley kindly drew his attention to the eagerly awaited substantive decision in the case of Actavis v Lilly (as we shall call it for short - you may wish to call it Actavis UK Ltd & Ors v Eli Lilly & Company [2014] EWHC 1511… [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 7:53 am by John Bursch
  So held the Michigan Supreme Court in Pellegrino v. [read post]
27 Sep 2024, 5:46 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” More to the point of this blog post, plaintiff has been required to turn over its mediation statements and documents from the underlying US District Court case. [read post]
10 May 2019, 6:17 am
Posted by , on Friday, May 10, 2019 Editor's Note: This roundup contains a collection of the posts published on the Forum during the week of May 3–9, 2019. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 5:22 am by SHG
To my mind, the case is really a follow-up to Atwater v. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 5:09 am by INFORRM
The Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights gave judgment on 14 September 2010 in the case of Sanoma Uitgevers BV v Netherlands in relation to the disclosure of confidential journalistic sources. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 6:40 am by kylew
  The Supreme Court decision may discourage patent applicants from using district court proceedings to challenge PTO decisions. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 12:18 am
Supreme Court oral argument in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 5:48 pm by Lyle Denniston
The case of International Refugee Assistance Project v. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 4:34 am by Barry Barnett
Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 (1986), the Supreme Court ruled that a party may not use a "peremptory strike" to prevent a member of a jury venire from serving on a criminal jury due to his or her race. [read post]