Search for: "National Bank v. Case" Results 4401 - 4420 of 5,229
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 May 2010, 2:59 am
"  --Michael Parenti, final remarks, California State University, Channel Islands, March 11, 2004.IntroductionOur nation is awakening to the fact that convenience-oriented industrial food products, which have substantially displaced our traditional diet, have altered our collective health for the worse. [read post]
9 May 2010, 12:17 pm by Marvin Ammori
Wade and opposes Lochner v New York, you know what she means if you know those cases. [read post]
6 May 2010, 7:38 am by Charles Kotuby
National Australia Bank, et al. (08-1191), which was argued in March. [read post]
4 May 2010, 9:04 pm by Adam Wagner
In two further decisions, the same judges held that the Treasury must give sufficient disclosure to allow a bank accused of involvement in Iranian nuclear proliferation to not just deny but refute the allegations (Bank Mellat v HM Treasury), and that the Home Office must provide the “gist” of material it had wanted to keep secret from an employment tribunal (Home Office v Tariq). [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:34 am by Joseph C. McDaniel
Now we call it "The BARF Act").Here's the way the stay is terminated by a creditor, which happens most frequently when the bank just can't wait to finish the trustee's sale in Arizona, and a bankruptcy is filed which stymies the bank in its evil quest. [read post]
2 May 2010, 3:42 am by Bartolus
The Court of Justice recently narrowed the scope of EU measures taken to freeze the funds of designated terrorist organizations in Case C-340/08 M v. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 11:17 am by Anna Christensen
So far, the Court has decided 33 of its argued cases this Term, including (as of yesterday) all cases argued during the October Sitting. [read post]
(v) Complete information on the transactions entered into shall be provided to the board of directors and the board of statutory auditors, at least every quarter. [read post]
Structural Shifts: concomitant widespread elimination of (i) supermajority voting requirements, (ii) staggered or classified board terms, and (iii) stockholder rights plans (often done to avoid or compromise likely stockholder proposals), accompanied by limitations on (iv) change-in-control executive severance agreements, along with (v) increased stockholder rights to call special stockholder meetings, in tandem with (vi) highly publicized proposals advocating multiflavored… [read post]