Search for: "PRECISION STANDARD V US"
Results 4401 - 4420
of 4,555
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jan 2008, 10:09 am
Cox, alluding to the AFSCME v. [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 9:48 am
" Wal-Mart has appealed precisely the unconstitutionality in the district court's order, so it is incumbent upon us to correct it.2007 WL 4303055, at *22. [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 1:26 pm
See 3 Restatement (Third) of Trusts § 87 (2007).The precise definitions of these various standards, the nuances separating them from one another, "cannot be imprisoned within any forms of words" for "we cannot escape, in relation to this problem, the use of undefined defining terms. [read post]
28 Dec 2007, 5:17 am
See, e.g., Kelley v. [read post]
17 Dec 2007, 6:40 pm
As was stated by Lamer J. in Insurance Corp. of British Columbia v. [read post]
17 Dec 2007, 3:14 pm
Three expressed doubts about the use of community standards, but said that additional facts were required for a determination. [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 2:33 pm
The first wave of defense briefing is now complete in Warner-Lambert v. [read post]
10 Dec 2007, 1:08 pm
§ 3(b) lacks standards that a court could meaningfully use in evaluating this type of high-level personnel decision. [read post]
10 Dec 2007, 5:26 am
Per Cordova v. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 10:08 pm
There's only 1 mention, at p. 66, of Johnson v. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 8:02 pm
Cantwell v. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 3:37 am
Cantwell v. [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 8:00 am
The Patent Reform Act of 2007 (PRA)Via the University of Chicago Law School Faculty Blog we are directed to Richard Epstein's column at the Financial Times (FT.com) website which views the Patent Reform Act of 2007 (PRA) as A dangerous one-two punch, arguing that changes to rules on patent-based injunctions and patent infringement damages would dampen patent innovation.As far as injunctions are concerned, Epstein points to the standard voiced by the US Supreme Court holding in… [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 10:36 am
For example, the government challenges the same kind of "these are only minimum standards" argument that plaintiffs commonly make in drug cases - and it specifically cites to the NDA standards that apply to drugs in making the argument:Contrary to petitioners' contention that FDA reviews devices only for "minimum standards" of safety and effectiveness, the MDA directs FDA to weigh any probable benefit to health from the use of the device… [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 7:45 am
Medtronic and Warner-Lambert v. [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 8:27 pm
Thus, this Chancery Court opinion also includes useful analysis of the demand futility standards under Aronson v. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 2:09 pm
For instance, has anybody had a non-standard Order drawn correctly recently?) [read post]
12 Nov 2007, 1:09 pm
Wade, Lawrence v. [read post]
12 Nov 2007, 1:25 am
” Skinner v. [read post]
12 Nov 2007, 1:25 am
” Skinner v. [read post]
