Search for: "People v Challenger"
Results 4401 - 4420
of 18,775
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Dec 2020, 11:28 am
FAR 33.103(d)(2)(v)-(vi). [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 11:04 am
People v. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 7:09 am
Miller challenged the admission of. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 5:33 pm
Stanley testified that he believed his gun was empty when he approached Boushie, and that the lethal bullet had discharged by accident.The acquittal raised a huge controversy, among others reasons because Stanley's lawyers had used peremptory challenges to exclude all visibly Indigenous people from the jury that acquitted him. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 4:07 pm
That is, the prime function of an Amt is to serve the people. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 12:41 pm
And what about a Free Exercise challenge? [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 9:11 am
Supreme Court upheld the PCAOB against a challenge based in separation of powers, albeit while severing Board member tenure provisions that the Court held unconstitutional (Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 6:28 am
That is, the prime function of an Amt is to serve the people. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 4:10 am
The complaint (full text) in Monclova Christian Academy v. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 4:06 am
(Pamela Samuelson’s Commentary on UMG v Augusto and Vernor v Autodesk) Vernor v Autodesk (EFF Amicus Brief in Key Case re First Sale and Contracts, Following UMG v Augusto) MDY v Blizzard (Justia) A Mixed Ninth Circuit Ruling in MDY v Blizzard: WoW Buyers Are Not Owners – But Glider Users Are not Copyright Infringers (EFF’s Commentary on MDY v Blizzard) Capitol Records v ReDigi (Wikipedia) Court’s… [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 10:42 am
Despite this good news, Republican legislators are still expected to challenge the rights of injured workers. [read post]
6 Dec 2020, 9:01 pm
Bush, where the Supreme Court held that prisoners could challenge their detention in federal court. [read post]
6 Dec 2020, 4:45 pm
Following the outrage, a number of changes have already been made to the parole board system and boards are now obliged to publish the reasoning behind their decisions and grant victims the right to challenge release decisions on violent offenders. [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 3:48 pm
Recently in Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn v. [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 2:39 pm
Gresham and Arkansas v. [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 1:31 pm
Co. v. [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 1:30 pm
Blog posts & press:Bureaucratic Gaps and Exclusion: The Limits of Documentary ‘Protection’ for Rohingyas in India (Kaldor Centre, Dec. 2020) [text]Coronavirus Reaches the World’s Most Persecuted People: The Threat of COVID-19 in the Rohingya Refugee Camps (Refugee Research Online, Nov. 2020) [text]Human Rights Metaphors: Revealing Regional Perspectives about Rohingya Displacement since the Andaman Sea Crisis (Kaldor Centre, Dec. 2020) [text]"Rohingya Refugees… [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 12:30 pm
And in further en banc news, the Sixth Circuit will reconsider its decision that a Kentucky prosecutor's striking four African-American veniremen did not violate Batson v. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 8:40 am
In Muransky v. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 2:45 am
In McNally v. [read post]
