Search for: "People v High" Results 4401 - 4420 of 15,043
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Apr 2007, 10:40 am
Indiana's approach "discriminates against people who don't understand English," Stephen Beardsley, Arrieta's lawyer, said last week. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 1:09 pm by Valerie Katz
Based on my experience going undercover as V. [read post]
7 Nov 2006, 4:49 pm
A peeved Remington unsuccessfully appealed the hearing officer's decision in the High Court. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 3:15 am by Ben
" And Mr Justice Birss in the High Court has ordered a group of ISPs to block access to the “Popcorn Time” application for copyright film and TV content: Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation and others v Sky UK Ltd and others. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 4:00 am by Legal Profession Assistance Conference
[iv] In the experiment, two resumes were presented to various people. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 1:18 am by Ben
 Geoffrey Heald won the first round of his legal battle against Randburg production company Combined Artists CC when a North Gauteng High Court judge ruled that his claim would have to be tested by a trial court. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 8:25 pm by Amy Howe
For lawyers and lay people who generally don’t immerse themselves in the interstices of bankruptcy law, the most interesting part of today’s oral argument in Husky International Electronics v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 8:28 am by Rosalind English
  Sign up to free human rights updates by email, Facebook, Twitter or RSS Related posts: High Court calls for joined-up thinking on disclosure of sex offender information Panorama at Winterbourne View: the human rights angle Should we be using ‘special offences’ to prosecute crimes against elderly people? [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 6:16 am by Adam Wagner
Quila & Ors v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 1482 – Read judgment A key part of the government’s strategy to combat forced marriages, preventing people under the age of 21 from entering the country to marry, has been heavily criticised by the Court of Appeal. [read post]