Search for: "People v. Sole" Results 4401 - 4420 of 6,181
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Mar 2012, 6:11 am by David Orentlicher
In particular, the constitutional challenge ultimately rests on a flawed premise—that if Congress can require people to buy a good or service solely because they are living in the United States, the commerce clause will be converted into an expansive power to compel just about any purchase. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:42 pm by Pace Law School Library
Land seizures in the People’s Republic of China: protecting property while encouraging economic development. 22 Pac. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:00 am by Rick
This recognition that “even Congress or the prosecutor” would think the longer sentences are not appropriate and — more importantly — that the sentences exist for the sole purpose of making sure people don’t try to claim their constitutional rights…well, you’d think this would implicate the Eighth Amendment. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 11:57 am by admin
Abortion, and more specifically the continuation of the Roe v. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 4:56 am
In effect, an invention is unpatentable if the sole inventive contribution is the discovery of a law of nature. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 9:56 pm by Simon Gibbs
(Thank God for Kynaston v Carroll [2011] EWHC 2179). [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 12:07 am by INFORRM
The sole basis for her exclusion is the fear that there will be unlawful reprisals by the Iranian Government if she is permitted to enter the UK. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 7:55 am by Mark S. Humphreys
The United States District Court, Southern District, Houston Division, issued an opinion on January 24, 2012, in a case styled, Bender Square Partners v. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 12:06 pm by Ilyse Schuman
It’s time we clarify the law to ensure that other people like Jack Gross aren’t put in similar situations. [read post]
17 Mar 2012, 12:51 pm by Jim Gerl
  In later installments, I have discussed the seminal decision of TK & SK ex rel LK v. [read post]