Search for: "R G v. G S" Results 4401 - 4420 of 6,911
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jan 2012, 6:22 pm
In 2001 the Commonwealth of Massachusetts' highest court addressed this issue in the case of Commonwealth v. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 9:03 am by Steve Hall
Both Abu-Jamal's case and Frank G. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 5:00 pm by David Kopel
The Supreme Court’s 1939 decision in United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 5:43 am by Lorene Park
” Refusing to dismiss the employee’s subsequent discrimination suit, the court found that her minor edit “manifested an intent to preserve her right to file a discrimination claim” (Allen v Chanel, Inc, SDNY June 4, 2013). [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 2:29 pm by Ken
Hr’g Tr., Sunlust Pictures, LLC v. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 4:19 am by Marie Louise
(IP Dragon) DuPont learns that global IP theft doesn’t stop at the border (China Hearsay) Europe The chocolate menagerie: General Court decides on bunny, reindeer and mouse shapes: Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Sprüngli AG v OHIM (jiplp) ECJ rules on legislative limitations on copyright protection for designs in Europe: Flos SpA v Semeraro Casa e Famiglia SpA (jiplp) AG delivers opinion in Viking Gas A/S v BP Gas A/S concerning trade mark law… [read post]
16 May 2011, 1:10 am by Marie Louise
(China Law Blog) Europe Deutsche Bahn appeals ‘red and grey’ to ECJ: Deutsche Bahn AG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (IPKat) Leaked ‘ACTA’ lobby letter reveals Hollywood pressure on EU (TorrentFreak) Pog appeal – the A-Gs opinion: PepsiCo v Grupo Promer Mon Graphic (Class 99) (Class 99) (IPKat) New online service provides OHIM certified copies (Class 46) Overview of 1800 decisions of… [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 1:39 pm by Michael Geist
V is for Voltage Pictures, which won a court order to obtain information on thousands of alleged file sharers. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 10:49 am
Les banques et les cabinets d'avocats doivent être en mesure de pouvoir identifier et vérifier l'identité de leurs clients. [read post]
5 Apr 2021, 7:23 am by Giles Peaker
But there was no evidence that Ms G had assigned her rights to ARAG, so the claim was wrongly brought under ARAG’s name and eveidence of assignment would be needed before judgment. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 3:45 pm
Originality • Bridgeman Art Library • Barry G. [read post]