Search for: "SUMMERS v. STATE"
Results 4401 - 4420
of 6,217
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2020, 8:28 am
’s allegations as of the summer of 2014. [read post]
14 Dec 2007, 10:37 am
., State of Indiana v. [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 11:24 pm
Lucas v. [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 11:24 pm
Lucas v. [read post]
18 Mar 2021, 10:28 am
That left the state law claims in the wrong court, so the case was remanded to the state court. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 11:00 am
Miller and Smith v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 11:39 am
Living Rivers Council v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 11:39 am
Living Rivers Council v. [read post]
14 May 2018, 2:14 pm
The case of Gibbs v. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 8:01 am
Our blogmeister Jeremy has been reminding us how difficult it is to find news stories during the long summer month of August. [read post]
28 Sep 2018, 7:49 am
Particularly, what does the opinion mean for acquired distinctiveness in the EU, in view of the The General Court and the Advocate General’s favoured approach, whereby sufficient evidence of acquired distinctiveness through use is required for every Member State. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 7:29 am
Edison, by the Supreme Court this past summer. [read post]
7 May 2014, 2:25 am
This is what the General Court concluded, referring to Case T-418/07 LIBRO v OHIM – Causley (LiBRO), and confirming the approach adopted in Specsavers. [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 9:11 pm
Apple over Apple Pay and access to the iPhone's NFC chipTwo weeks ago, Apple moved to dismiss the Affinity Credit Union v. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 11:27 am
Battelle Energy Alliance, LLC v. [read post]
10 Sep 2024, 3:00 am
On August 20, 2024, the Northern District of Texas issued its final ruling in Ryan , LLC . v . [read post]
23 Nov 2022, 5:04 am
While this constitutes a significant opportunity cost to OPPO, Nokia has multiple problems with the state of affairs:Each time Nokia releases its quarterly numbers, it has to justify the impact of non-renewals. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 9:27 am
Cisson v. [read post]
Apple filing reveals Samsung recently reduced its 2.4% royalty demand for standard-essential patents
5 Apr 2013, 10:17 am
The Ericsson v. [read post]
