Search for: "Sellers v. Sellers"
Results 4401 - 4420
of 6,091
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2011, 11:17 am
Eros, LLC et al v. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 6:27 pm
McIntyre Machinery Ltd. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 6:13 pm
EVELYN NYE v. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 5:00 am
For the reasons why other courts disagree, we recommend reading Alm v. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 1:48 am
Gebr Weber GmbH v Wittmer Putz v Medianess Electronics GmbH Joined cases C-65/09 and C-87/09; [2011] WLR (D) 210 “Where consumer goods, installed in good faith by the consumer, were not in conformity with the contract under which the consumer had purchased and and were restored to conformity by way of replacement, the seller was obliged pursuant to article 3(2)(3) of Parliament and Council Directive 1999/44/EC either to remove the goods from where they had been… [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 11:28 pm
Bernt Hugenholtz € 110 Concise International and European Law – 2nd edition by Pierre Véron, Thomas Cottier € 180 Copyright Enforcement and the Internet by Irini Stamatoudi € 135 [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 1:05 pm
McIntyre Machinery Ltd. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 10:11 am
Kentucky v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 8:33 am
Cendant Mobility Financial Corp. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 8:33 am
Cendant Mobility Financial Corp. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 7:32 am
” Here is a link to briefs in Brown v. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 5:45 pm
Rempson v. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 7:20 am
• Leave a comment on ECJ: Private copying levies II-the Stichting de Thuiskopie v. [read post]
25 Jun 2011, 8:29 am
Al. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2011, 8:29 am
Al. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 4:44 pm
(David Kopel) A recent Yale Law Journal Online article by Northwestern law professor Andrew Koppelman argues that the Obamacare individual mandate is obviously constitutional, especially in light of how McCulloch v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 1:50 pm
United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 9:52 am
Co. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 6:16 pm
However, in such a case, it would be better practice to use terms like “Seller”, “Lessor” etc than to use such confusing expressions.]July 97 Real made a reference to Board of Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (BIFR) under the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 6:16 pm
The court, relying on Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Ltd. v Verma Transport Company (pdf) (2006) 7 SCC 275 held that merely filing an application for temporary injunction or a reply to the same would not amount to submission on the substance of the issue. [read post]
