Search for: "Small v. People" Results 4401 - 4420 of 7,512
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
Senate Finance Committee Chair Ron Wyden (D-OR) has announced a proposal to begin to tax a small part of what is known as “unrealized” income. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
”  Take, for example, his statement that Burwell v. [read post]
19 Mar 2025, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
After all, the core idea underlying the modern First Amendment is that the government may not as Justice Jackson put it in West Virginia v. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 10:46 am by Susan Brenner
A number of other people were at the apartment, including [Black], who had gone to the apartment with John Owens. [read post]
11 Nov 2012, 4:15 pm by NL
The Council takes the view that homeless applicants will not jump to the top of the housing queue with the result that people who are overcrowded or badly housed for medical or social reasons move down the list. [read post]
11 Nov 2012, 4:15 pm by NL
The Council takes the view that homeless applicants will not jump to the top of the housing queue with the result that people who are overcrowded or badly housed for medical or social reasons move down the list. [read post]
25 Dec 2012, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit invalidated an Illinois law barring most people from publicly carrying loaded guns in Moore v. [read post]
22 Oct 2007, 8:16 pm
They are no less regulated than mutual funds, which are more familiar to most common people. [read post]
23 Sep 2024, 7:32 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
In a 2016 blog written shortly after Matter of Z-A-, Inc . it was observed that “[i]n a globalized world, where people are easily connected to each other by the internet, it is no longer necessary for a manager to rely on personnel in one location, namely in the United States. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 6:35 am by Marty Lederman
  Here’s the key, striking passage from page 7 of the government's petition in Trump v. [read post]
24 Mar 2012, 2:59 pm by Eugene Volokh
(This could happen either if D was planning to kill V all along, if D and V are involved a dispute and D kills V in a moment of anger, or if D and V are involved in a fight that doesn’t suffice to authorize deadly force, but D uses deadly force in any case.) [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 7:18 am
: Whirlpool Corporation v Kenwood Ltd (IPKat) EWHC (Pat): EP 258 valid in Netherlands but not UK: Novartis AG and Cibavision AG v Johnson & Johnson Medical Ltd & Ors (IPKat) EWHC (QB): When lawfully seized items can’t be retained under s 22 Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (1709 Copyright Blog) United States US General Obama IP vacancies (IP Frontline) Kappos confirmation hearing set for 29 July (IP Watchdog) (IAM) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent… [read post]