Search for: "State v. Character" Results 4401 - 4420 of 7,502
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Sep 2010, 12:46 pm by Madhav Khosla
In this chapter, I offer a provisional answer to these questions, by puzzling through the recent judgment of the Delhi High Court in Naz Foundation v. [read post]
10 Mar 2021, 7:28 am by Patricia Salkin
Muller v Zoning Board of Appeals Town of Lewisboro, 2021 WL 900864 (NYAD 2 Dept. 3/10/2021) [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 6:23 am by NRF Digital Team
A determination of the fairness of an indemnity policy in terms of section 48(2)(a) and (b) involves the application of the seminal test of Barkhuizen v Napier 2007 (5) SA 323 (CC). [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 1:40 pm by admin
  However, as the Supreme Court recently ruled (PDF) in Brown v. [read post]
22 Jul 2021, 5:41 am by Patrick Bracher (ZA)
A determination of the fairness of an indemnity policy in terms of section 48(2)(a) and (b) involves the application of the seminal test of Barkhuizen v Napier 2007 (5) SA 323 (CC). [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 4:26 pm by Patricia Salkin
Nevertheless, Appellants stated that the Board properly respected URA’s approach, finding that the existing buildings were part of the unique and historic character of the area and should be preserved. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 4:57 am
Via the Suits and Sentences Blog (HT: How Appealing), we see a summary of a recent Judge Posner opinion about the growing problems created by "private entrapment":  But the really intriguing part of United States v. [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 5:06 am
[Miami Herald; see also Parker v. [read post]
26 Jul 2020, 8:24 am by Patricia Salkin
  Earley v Board of Adjustment of Cerro Gordo County, 2020 WL 4201790 (IA App. 7/22/2020) [read post]