Search for: "State v. Sample"
Results 4401 - 4420
of 4,544
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Sep 2007, 9:00 pm
Miller v. [read post]
26 Sep 2007, 1:04 pm
Cir. 2005) (quoting Innova/Pure Water, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 8:10 am
In addition, the Supreme Court has taken up Baze v. [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 10:57 am
The offenders were selected in such a way that the overall sample reflects the characteristics of a random sample of sex offenders sentenced in Virginia's circuit courts in calendar years (CY) 1996 and 1997. [read post]
21 Sep 2007, 7:53 am
., et al. v. [read post]
16 Sep 2007, 6:48 pm
Sets out all of the information states must acquire as part of registration, including a DNA sample and "any other information required by the attorney general. [read post]
16 Sep 2007, 10:18 am
See State v. [read post]
16 Sep 2007, 8:09 am
State v. [read post]
15 Sep 2007, 7:49 pm
As well, given that single studies typically lack the statistical power to detect small effects, many apparent inconsistencies can often be attributed to the chance fluctuations expected among studies with varying sample sizes (Rosenthal & DiMatteo, 2000).Hall's (1995) meta-analysis included 12 studies that appeared after Furby et al.'s (1989) narrative review. [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 11:15 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Linda Patton v. [read post]
12 Sep 2007, 9:06 am
A recent example is Szymanski v. [read post]
12 Sep 2007, 6:05 am
Viking Yacht Co. v. [read post]
7 Sep 2007, 6:25 am
For a copy of the Appellate Term's decision, please use this link: People v. [read post]
6 Sep 2007, 4:29 pm
A later decision by the Ninth Circuit in Laws v. [read post]
5 Sep 2007, 7:39 am
The district court ordered Merck to submit the withheld documents for in camera review and then to categorize them and thereby enable the court to rule on "random samples of each category. [read post]
5 Sep 2007, 1:27 am
LLC NEW YORK COUNTY Employment Ex-Employee States Cognizable Claim for Promissory Estoppel; Amended Complaint Filed as Of Right Bones v. [read post]
31 Aug 2007, 6:23 am
See United States v. [read post]
30 Aug 2007, 12:54 am
Despite rulings like Columbia Pictures Industries v. [read post]
29 Aug 2007, 9:04 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Aug 2007, 9:00 pm
In United States v. [read post]
