Search for: "The United States, Petitioner"
Results 4401 - 4420
of 8,962
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Aug 2012, 7:52 pm
Twenty-nine supplemental briefs were filed in mid-July in support of the plaintiff-petitioners, more than doubling the 14 briefs filed in support of the plaintiff-petitioners in the first round. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 9:07 pm
The court recognized the principles of two landmark United States Supreme Court cases to explain the relationship between the courts and the residents of their states. [read post]
Specialty Healthcare framework consistent with NLRA, but regional director did not properly apply it
23 Nov 2016, 7:58 am
(Section 9(c) of the NLRA explicitly states that “in determining whether a unit is appropriate . . . the extent to which the employees have organized shall not be controlling. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 2:24 pm
Opinion below (11th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner's reply Brief amicus curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States Brief amicus curiae of National Retail Federation Brief amicus curiae of DRI – The Voice of the Defense Bar [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 4:31 pm
” Petitioners then claimed that the project would have an undue adverse impact on the nearby state-owned, DEC–operated boat launch at Tupper Lake. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 6:43 am
Georgia, 31 U.S. 515, 556 (1831) (“[The Cherokee treaty], thus explicitly recognizing the national character of the Cherokees, and their right of self government; thus guarantying their lands; assuming the duty of protection, and of course pledging the faith of the United States for that protection; has been frequently renewed, and is now in full force. [read post]
19 May 2015, 3:08 pm
As for the impacts associated with the proposed revisions, FWS and NMFS state in the proposed rule that “[w]hile some of the changes may require petitioners to expend some time (such as coordination with State(s)) and effort (providing complete petitions), we do not expect this will prove to be a hardship, economically or otherwise. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 2:53 am
P. 30(b)(6), residing in a foreign country to come to the United States for the taking of his or her discovery deposition. [read post]
25 Feb 2007, 10:27 pm
The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit affirmed the denial, stating that under Tennessee v. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 6:53 pm
Finally, the petitioner seeking the waiver needs to demonstrate that, on balance, it would be beneficial to the United States to waive the job offer and labor certification requirements. [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 2:18 pm
United States, No. 06-6330, 552 U.S. --- (2007). [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 9:57 am
The Federal circuit reversed on appeal stating that a cause of action is not contingent on whether a petitioner has proprietary rights in its own mark. [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 5:36 pm
Wolf: Petitioners contend that the Executive Order violates the equal protection clauses of the United States and Pennsylvania Constitutions…. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 9:56 pm
However, district courts may not exercise their habeas jurisdiction to enjoin the United States from transferring individuals alleged to have committed crimes and detained within the territory of a foreign sovereign to that sovereign's government for criminal prosecution. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 1:53 pm
Under federal law, immigration officials may not admit someone to the United States if they deem that person likely to become a public charge, or dependent on government benefits. [read post]
27 Mar 2010, 11:20 am
The interpretive battle between petitioners and the federal government begins with a tour through the United States Code for textual clues of Congress’s meaning. [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 12:34 pm
The United States will also argue as an amicus curiae in support of petitioners. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 8:38 am
Washington or whether this is one of that rare breed of cases exempt from that requirement under United States v. [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 5:48 pm
United States that Section 922(g) requires the government to prove that the defendant knew he was prohibited from possessing a firearm. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 7:18 pm
United States v. [read post]
