Search for: "UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE" Results 4401 - 4420 of 6,104
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2011, 1:29 am by Marie Louise
Timothy Langdell (Innovationpartners) United States US Patent Reform House passes H.R. 1249 America Invents Act (Inventive Step) (Patently-O) (Patent Law Practice Center) (Patent Docs) (Patents Post-Grant) (Patent Baristas) (Trademark Blog of the Trademark Lawyer’s Mind) (IPBiz) Patent Reform debate begins today in house (Patents Post Grant Blog) Debate over H.R. 1249 continues… [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 8:41 am by Kali Borkoski
Hyatt Docket: 10-1219 Issue(s): Whether a plaintiff, who is appealing the denial of an application of a patent by commencing a civil action against the Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) in a federal district court pursuant to 35 U.S.C. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 3:25 pm by Christa Culver
Novo Nordisk A/SDocket: 10-844Issue(s): Whether the counterclaim provision of the Hatch-Waxman Act applies when (1) there is “an approved method of using the drug” that “the patent does not claim,” and (2) the brand submits “patent information” to the FDA that misstates the patent's scope, requiring “correct[ion]. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 2:56 pm by Stephen Albainy-Jenei
Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO),” says Alexander Poltorak, AIPR’s founder and president. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 10:00 am
. - The United States House of Representatives has passed H.R. 1249, the Leahy-Smith American Invents Act, which is said to be the most dramatic change to patent law since the 1950s. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 4:30 am by Stefanie Levine
There are important differences between the two bills, chief among them is funding for the United States Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 4:30 am by Stefanie Levine
There are important differences between the two bills, chief among them is funding for the United States Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 3:33 pm by Gene Quinn
There are important differences between the two bills, chief among them is funding for the United States Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 12:19 pm by Gene Quinn
The House is poised to pass H.R. 1249, together with prior user rights and without giving the United States Patent and Trademark Office access to the fees it collects without the blessing and approval of appropriators. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 8:19 am by Stephen Albainy-Jenei
As a result, the bill would permit the Patent and Trademark Office to award a patent to the first person who can win a race to the patent office regardless of who is the actual inventor. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 11:59 am by Gene Quinn
On the other hand, the United States Patent and Trademark Office continues to have user funds siphoned off, making the USPTO a much larger taxpayer than the largest U.S. corporations. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 7:11 am by Kevin Houchin
We checked the database at the United States Patent & Trademark Office and they haven’t registered the brand. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 2:08 pm by Aurelia Mitchell Durant
  Trademark protection in the United States includes registration with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 11:02 am by Guest Barista
If fee collections by the Patent and Trademark Office for a fiscal year exceed the amount appropriated to the Office for that fiscal year, fees collected in excess of the appropriated amount shall be deposited in the Patent and Trademark Fee Reserve Fund. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 8:53 am by Gene Quinn
The United States Patent and Trademark Office has just announced the expansion of the PCT-PPH pilot program with the Korean Intellectual Property Office (KIPO), as well as two new PPH pilot programs; a new pilot project for the Patent Prosecution Highway with the Nordic Patent Institute (NPI) based on NPI’s Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) work products and a new pilot project for the Patent Prosecution… [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 4:27 am by Marie Louise
Kurian – the Patent Office’s ‘knight in shining armour’ – resigns as the Controller General (Spicy IP) Reforming the patents & trademarks adjudication mechanism in India – Why does the Indian IP Bar continue to sleep? [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 1:12 pm by Morris Turek
  Optimally, a trademark license should also explicitly state: whether the license is exclusive or non-exclusive the duration of the license whether the license may be renewed and under what conditions the amount of any royalty payments or other compensation due to the licensor and when those payments are to be made the responsibilities of both parties upon the termination or expiration of the license the consequences of breaching the license and the time in which the breach… [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 4:33 am by Brian Scott
United States law all or part of this article may be confusing or unclear.In the United States, copyright law has changed several times since the founding of the country. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 7:45 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
The marks on the merchandise were identical to and substantially indistinguishable from marks used on genuine merchandise, and were in use and registered for such goods on the principle register of the United States Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]