Search for: "United States v. Alter"
Results 4401 - 4420
of 4,640
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2008, 3:25 pm
When employees complained about not being paid their wages, the Division of Labor Standards Enforcement (DLSE) and the United States Department of Labor (DOL) stepped in. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 10:48 am
United States, 250 U.S. 616 (1919). [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 5:07 am
" In one of the cases that established the "good faith" exception to the exclusionary rule exercised for 4th Amendment violations (United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 2:29 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal Practice
New Trial Denied to Man Convicted of Presenting Altered Checks to IRS at Tax Assessment Hearings
United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 2:00 am
Protecting computer programs under the Copyright Act: Dais Studios v Bullet Creative: (IP Down Under), Assessing copyright risk in new classroom technologies: (IP Down Under), Cadbury loses battle over exclusive use of colour purple for chocolate wrapping in its case against Darrell Lea: (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog), (IP Down Under), (IPKat), (IPwar’s), Employee or independent contractor? [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 4:43 pm
Clinton, 48 M.J. 84 (C.A.A.F. 1998), and United States v. [read post]
6 Apr 2008, 12:02 pm
USA v Knowles 2007 U.S. [read post]
4 Apr 2008, 2:50 am
But most of section one is written in abstract and vague language combining standards, principles, and terms of art; it speaks of "privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States," "due process of law," and "equal protection of the laws. [read post]
4 Apr 2008, 1:00 am
- Counterfeit cash flooding the market: (Afro-IP), Debranded fakes for Liberia: an update: (Afro-IP), South African music industry blames pirates for falling sales of local artists: (Afro-IP), Plaintiff obtains interlocutory relief in patent case Sanitam Services Limited v Bins (Nairobi) Services Limited: (Afro-IP), South Africa – new patent judgments: Buckman Laboratories v Bromine Compounds; Northpark Trading 3 (Pty) Ltd v Ausplow (Pty) Ltd:… [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 2:06 pm
It appears to be substantially the same as the original.Update: On April 17, 2008, the Court vacated its opinion and judgment sua sponte, explaining that an amended opinion will be filed forthwith.In United States v. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 9:57 am
In Tafas v. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 9:32 am
Dudas and the United States Patent and Trademark Office and their agents, servants, and employees are permanently enjoined from implementing the Final Rules” Notes: The court made no attempt to carve-out portions of the rules that may be legal. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 8:27 am
John Dudas and the United States Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 7:38 am
Dudas and the United States Patent and Trademark Office):"Today's ruling enjoining the PTO from implementing its controversial rules on continuations and claims is a sound decision that reflects the concerns we expressed in our amicus brief. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 5:59 am
Reg. 46,716-843 (Aug. 21, 2007)(to be codified at 37 C.F.R. pt. 1)(the "Final Rules") under his decision in Tafas v. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 11:00 pm
It must be an account of why changes in constitutional doctrine over time- which largely occur outside of Article V amendment and are not in the control of any single person, much less any single judge- are legitimate. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 8:25 pm
Introduction On March 7, 2008, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit filed its opinion in the case of International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 2:04 pm
Yesterday SCOTUS decided MEDELLIN v. [read post]
24 Mar 2008, 1:59 pm
[iii] Springer v. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 2:15 am
The United States Supreme Court, in the little known 1975 case of US v. [read post]
