Search for: "United States v. Minor" Results 4401 - 4420 of 7,101
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Nov 2012, 6:40 am
(v) Where necessary to protect health or safety, a claimant may commence immediate repairs to heating systems, hot water systems, and necessary electrical connections, as well as exterior windows, exterior doors, and, for minor permanent repairs, exterior walls, in order to enable property to retain heat, and any policy requirement that the policyholder exhibit the remains of the property may be satisfied by the policyholder submitting proof of loss documentation of the damaged or… [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 6:40 am
(v) Where necessary to protect health or safety, a claimant may commence immediate repairs to heating systems, hot water systems, and necessary electrical connections, as well as exterior windows, exterior doors, and, for minor permanent repairs, exterior walls, in order to enable property to retain heat, and any policy requirement that the policyholder exhibit the remains of the property may be satisfied by the policyholder submitting proof of loss documentation of the damaged or… [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 4:33 pm
The United States Supreme Court ruled back in 2005 that minors who commit capital offenses cannot be sentenced to the death penalty. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 11:29 am by jleaming@acslaw.org
However, in League of United Latin American Citizens v. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 12:15 pm by Kenneth J. Vanko
" The Supreme Court of the United States did not like that, chastising the state court for disregarding the law and not bowing to the broad policy favoring arbitration (even in state court) under the Federal Arbitration Act.Due to that minor little thing called the Supremacy Clause, Oklahoma had to follow the Supreme Court's interpretation of the FAA. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 1:08 pm by Cicely Wilson
California) United States of America v. eBay, Inc., (US District Court, N.D. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 1:08 pm by Cicely Wilson
California) United States of America v. eBay, Inc., (US District Court, N.D. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 4:51 am by Heidi Henson
Supreme Court’s decisions in Washington v Seattle Sch Dist No 1 (1982) and Hunter v Erickson (1969), the appeals court found that Proposal 2 unconstitutionally altered Michigan’s political structure by impermissibly burdening racial minorities. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 12:24 pm by Sandy Levinson
  It is this dreadful feature of our political system, NOT required by the Constitution, that explains why it now counts as "success" if the United States doesn't go over a "cliff" or continues to pay its debts, as against genuinely confronting the serious problems that face us as a polity. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 9:14 am
In the most recent decision, the Arbitration Panel specifically found that: Claimants are recent immigrants to the United States and they had very limited investment experience. [read post]
14 Nov 2012, 7:07 am by Charles Johnson
Your case will mostly be affected by recent published opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit and the United States Supreme Court. [read post]