Search for: "Warne v. State" Results 4401 - 4420 of 14,215
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Feb 2018, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
As summarised by Arnold J at §48: The Programme was largely filmed in their home; it showed them being evicted without prior warning; it showed them in a state of shock and distress; it showed them being taunted by Omar Ahmed [son of the Landlord]; and it was foreseeable that the broadcasting of the Programme would have an adverse effect on their children [they had two, in school at the time of the eviction]. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 12:45 pm
Trump issued on Jan. 29 in a challenge brought by the ACLU of Massachusetts and local attorneys, and Mohammad v. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 4:59 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Plaintiff’s signed agreement with the nonparty funder, selling a portion of his interest in any potential future litigation proceeds, “conclusively establishes a defense to the asserted claim as a matter of law,” as it shows that defendants did not commit any misconduct by failing to warn plaintiff of the terms of the agreement (Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 88 [1994]; see CPLR 3211[a][1]), which plaintiff admittedly signed (see VXI Lux Holdco S.A.R.L.… [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 1:49 pm by zshapiro
The question facing the Third Circuit Court of Appeals in United States v. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 1:00 am by Rose Hughes
The decision in Ensygnia v Shell is a fresh warning, if one was needed, of the substantial risks of description amendments. [read post]
23 Mar 2021, 6:00 am by Sarah Phillips
Warning letter language often states that the offending product is a: “new animal drug, as defined by section 201(v) of the FD&C Act, 21 U.S.C. 321(v), because it is not generally recognized among experts qualified by scientific training and experience to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of animal drugs, as safe and effective for use under the conditions prescribed, recommended, or suggested in the labeling. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 1:46 pm
Lesley Stedman Weidenbener of the Louisville Courier Journal reports today on a case to be heard Monday, June 16th, at 1:00 PM before the Indiana Supreme Court, State of Indiana v. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 12:11 pm by Bexis
Thanks and congratulations to Christy Jones and Anita Modak-Truran of Butler Snow for letting us know about - and more importantly winning - today's decision in Smith v. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 6:12 am by Joy Waltemath
On December 17, the employee received a final warning which stated that further violations would result in termination. [read post]