Search for: "A----. B v. C----. D" Results 4421 - 4440 of 10,367
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Sep 2011, 1:35 am by J.W. Verret
” This project is inspired by the DC Circuit’s opinion in Business Roundtable v. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 5:08 am
* Swedes consider the "penal value" of a trade mark infringementProsecutor General v CS (Case B-5484-13) is a trade mark infringement ruling where the Swedish Supreme Court addresses criminal consequences of IP infringement. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 8:34 pm by Larry Catá Backer
For this purpose, the NCP will consult with these parties and where relevant: a) seek advice from relevant authorities, and/or representatives of the business community, worker organisations, other non- governmental organisations, and relevant experts; b) consult the NCP in the other country or countries concerned;c) seek the guidance of the Committee if it has doubt about the interpretation of the Guidelines in particular circumstances;d) offer, and with the agreement of… [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 12:59 pm by Timothy Tobin and James Denvil
§§ 2703(c)(1)(B), (d), which permits law enforcement to compel providers of electronic communications services to disclose client records in response to court orders that are supported by “specific and articulable facts showing that there are reasonable grounds to believe” that the requested records “are relevant and material to an ongoing criminal investigation. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 2:59 am by INFORRM
The Supreme Court of Canada has issued its decision in Google Inc v Equustek (2017 SCC 34). [read post]
15 Oct 2016, 12:38 pm
The subpoena asked for:`Any and all e-mail addresses associated with [24.15.180.222]; a) customer name and other user name(s); b) addresses; c) records of session times and durations; d) length of service (including start date) and types of service used; e) telephone or instrument number or other subscriber number or identity, including any temporarily assigned network address; and f) means and source of payment for such service (including any credit card or bank account… [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 11:50 am by admin
 28, a defendant claiming fair comment must satisfy the following test: (a) the comment must be on a matter of public interest; (b) the comment must be based on fact; (c) the comment, though it can include inferences of fact, must be recognisable as comment; (d) the comment must satisfy the following objective test: could any person honestly express that opinion on the proved facts? [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 6:52 pm
"  The factors he considered in concluding that estoppel applied were (a) the Plaintiff's oral and written representations that they intended to withdraw, including one Plaintiff's statement "I am out of here," (b) the treatment by all parties of Plaintiffs' departure as a withdrawal, (c) the Plaintiffs' formation of their own firm, (d) Defendants' detrimental reliance on Plaintiffs' representations of… [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 9:07 pm by MacIsaac
Reasons for judgement were released this week by the BC Supreme Court, New Westminster Registry, (Bove v. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 5:01 am
Bender Consulting Ltd. d/b/a Asian Pacific Beverages,Cancellation No. 92057132 (December 7, 2017) [precedential] (Opinion by Judge Cynthia C. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 12:08 am by Joseph McClelland
 So if everyone knows this employee, does A, B and C, then the employer may be liable for negligent hiring and retention. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 10:20 pm by Jean Braucher
  Rejecting the section 506(d) argument, the court suggested that it agreed with the section 1322(b)(2) route. [read post]