Search for: "Cost v. Cost"
Results 4421 - 4440
of 48,082
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Sep 2008, 11:40 pm
Economy Fire & Casualty Company v. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 9:15 pm
Now, more than 40 years after the landmark Fifth Circuit Borel v. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 11:00 pm
In Fox v. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 12:22 am
The policy provided cover for legal costs and expenses in a number of contingencies, including those incurred in a contractual dispute arising from an agreement or alleged agreement entered into for the provision of goods and services. [read post]
27 Sep 2015, 11:00 pm
That’s the Half of It: eDiscovery TrendsBelieve it or Not, Apple v. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 4:15 am
Goldhar v Haaretz.com. [read post]
8 May 2014, 3:00 am
Cato’s Caleb Brown interviews me about this week’s Supreme Court decision in the local-government invocation case of Town of Greece v. [read post]
21 May 2014, 3:42 am
Eastern (fee-based, CLE credit available) presented by the ABA’s State and Local Government Law Section on Town of Greece v. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 10:00 pm
In Dynamo Holdings v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 1:29 pm
(The case is Golan v. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 4:04 pm
The Judge found in Estate of Claudia Cohen v. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 1:46 pm
So the Ninth Circuit spanks them, and imposes a fee and cost award, plus another $500 to the Ninth Circuit for good measure.By contrast, four of the other attorneys on the case "allowed their names to be placed on briefs that presented frivolous and inflammatory arguments. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 11:46 am
The case Richey v. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 3:18 pm
Orlando Residence, Ltd. v. [read post]
20 May 2016, 8:41 am
In DG21, LLC v. [read post]
8 Jan 2020, 4:28 am
He recognised that having three more music pieces that have to be compared would greatly increase the cost and complexity and length of the trial. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 12:07 pm
In today’s decision (IJ v. [read post]
16 Jul 2008, 12:56 pm
DuPont, et al v. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 7:28 pm
by failing to advise the board of JHIL that the reviews of the Cashflow Model by PwC and Access Economics were limited to reporting on the logical soundness and technical correctness of it and they had not verified, and had been specifically instructed not to consider, the key assumptions adopted by the Cashflow Model, being fixed investment earnings rates, litigation and management costs and future claim costs, Mr Macdonald, Mr Shafron and Mr Morley breached Section 180(1). [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 3:17 am
Sibthorpe and another v Southwark London Borough Council (Law Society intervening) [2011] EWCA Civ 25; [2011] WLR (D) 21 “A conditional fee agreement which provided for the claimant’s solicitors to indemnify her against payment of the defendant’s costs if the claim was dismissed was not champertous or otherwise contrary to public policy. [read post]
