Search for: "D, Otherwise C. v. C"
Results 4421 - 4440
of 4,551
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Oct 2015, 3:00 am
” As Yale Law School professor Jack Balkin explains, relying on intermediaries to enforce laws about expression creates a structural problem: Collateral censorship occurs when the state holds one private party A liable for the speech of another private party B, and A has the power to block, censor, or otherwise control access to B’s speech. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 4:52 pm
Otherwise, the regular rate for trusts with no identified beneficiaries or beneficiaries that are not close family members or charitable trust is 8 per cent. [read post]
26 May 2020, 3:06 pm
Otherwise, persons in specific categories may enter. [read post]
8 Oct 2012, 10:19 pm
It's absolutely unambiguous.The Constitution says that the federal government can do A, B, C, and D. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 9:05 am
In support of proposed Classes 7B, C, and G. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 3:46 am
With respect to NPs, Medicare Part B covers the service that they perform only if the services would be covered if furnished by a physician,[15] is not otherwise statutorily excluded from coverage,[16] AND the mid-level practitioner performs the services while working in “collaboration”[17] with a physician. [read post]
24 May 2011, 6:33 pm
The public adjuster representing the insured may be present for the insurer’s inspection, but if the unavailability of the public adjuster otherwise delays the insurer’s timely inspection of the property, the public adjuster or the insured must allow the insurer to have access to the property without the participation or presence of the public adjuster or insured in order to facilitate the insurer’s prompt inspection of the loss or damage. [read post]
5 Apr 2022, 11:22 am
From Thursday's opinion in State v. [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm
” Covered entities include: Registered brokers or dealers that (a) maintain custody of cash and securities for customers or other broker-dealers; (b) introduce customer accounts to another broker or dealer that maintains cash and securities; (c) have regulatory capital equal to or exceeding $50 million; (d) have total assets equal to or exceeding $1 billion; (e) are market makers under the Exchange Act, its rules, or the rules of an SRO of which the broker or dealer is… [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 7:23 pm
C. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 11:44 am
Congress since 1958: Selected Resources Compiled by Cheryl Smith Cheatham Reference Librarian/Law-Medicine Specialist The Judge Ben C. [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 7:38 am
” (xiv) The “intellectual lodestar” (xxxii) of the libertarian movement is John C. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 1:42 am
C. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 4:03 am
But they’d have to pay instead of getting paid. [read post]
15 Feb 2022, 1:55 am
After the tables, we document notable individual income tax changes implemented in 2022. 2022 State Income Tax Rates and Brackets State Individual Income Tax Rates and Brackets, as of January 1, 2022 Single Filer Married Filing Jointly Standard Deduction Personal Exemption State Rates Brackets Rates Brackets Single Couple Single Couple Dependent Alabama 2.00% > $0 2.00% > $0 $2,500 $7,500 $1,500 $3,000 $1,000 (a, b, c) 4.00% > $500 4.00% > $1,000 … [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 7:27 am
However, a CA RIA that: (i) is deemed to have custody solely because it acts as the general partner of a limited partnership, or a comparable position for another type of pooled investment vehicle; and (ii) otherwise complies with the California custody rule described above is exempt from the $35,000 minimum (and instead is required to maintain the $10,000 minimum). [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 11:27 am
However, a CA RIA that: (i) is deemed to have custody solely because it acts as the general partner of a limited partnership, or a comparable position for another type of pooled investment vehicle; and (ii) otherwise complies with the California custody rule described above is exempt from the $35,000 minimum (and instead is required to maintain the $10,000 minimum). [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 9:53 am
But if the differences are great enough, you’d think they might show through even with bad methods. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 3:11 am
” See West River Bridge v. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 11:59 pm
The EPC has no explicit provision preventing double patenting by the same applicant of the same invention; not by two applications filed on the same date but not connected via priority or otherwise, not by two applications filed on different dates but linked by priority (so having the same effective date but different filing date), not by by two applications filed on different dates but with the same filing date (i.e., a parent and a divisional). [read post]
