Search for: "Doe VI " Results 4421 - 4440 of 5,650
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Mar 2017, 2:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Hartley & Ors v King Edward VI College, heard 1 February 2017. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 12:23 pm by Bill Merkel
Sharpe (requiring desegregation of public schools in Washington D.C.) was not, since the Equal Protection Clause does not by its own terms target the federal government. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 2:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Hartley & Ors v King Edward VI College, heard 1 February 2017. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Impact on DEI Initiatives SFFA does not interpret or address Title VII of the Civil Rights Act or 42 U.S.C. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 12:53 pm by charonqc
  It matters not, for regular readers of my brothers blog will know that while he pays lip service to the law with his little ‘vignettes’ which he is pleased to call ‘Law Reviews’ – he does not over exert his mind on legal matters in those lucid periods between visits to his vintner. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 6:01 am by SHG
Sadly, it is evident that Judge Adams cares more about himself than he does the federal judiciary. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 10:30 am by Francisco Macías
All should see to it, then, that in catechetical work or in the preaching of the word of God they do not teach anything that does not conform to the truth of the Gospel and the spirit of Christ. [read post]
14 Dec 2008, 4:11 pm
This limitation is imposed by the federal statute, the Parental Kidnapping Prevention Act which trumps the UCCJEA because of the constitutional supremacy clause (Article VI, Clause 2). [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 11:00 am by Kelly Goles
[Photo by Flickr user Dāvis Mosāns. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 11:07 am by Sara Savat
Does your answer change if the religious values and norms contradict mainstream American values? [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 9:53 am by Cristian M. Soler and Neil Abramson
This disclosure does not pertain to information received by a party to the action, counsel of record, or law firm of record [read post]
6 Nov 2024, 11:41 am by admin
  It does not instruct judges on how to rule regarding admissibility of particular types of evidence, but instead offers judges advice on how to manage expert testimony, discusses emerging problems with expert testimony, and provides information on the methodology of areas of science that often present difficult issues when introduced in the form of expert testimony. [read post]