Search for: "English v. English"
Results 4421 - 4440
of 11,196
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Aug 2020, 2:44 am
In the case of R (on the application of Bridges) v Chief Constable of South Wales Police ([2020] EWCA Civ 1058) the Court of Appeal held that the live automated facial recognition technology (“AFR”) used by the South Wales Police Force (“SWP”) was unlawful as it was not “in accordance with law” for the purposes of Article 8 of the ECHR. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 2:51 am
Even though IP rights have been mentioned in IIAs as protected investments for decades, Eli Lilly v. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 9:00 am
Merpel doesn't get out of bed for any IPEC (né Patents County Court) judgment -- but Brundle v Perry [2014] EWHC 979 isn't any IPEC judgment. [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 5:39 pm
The appeal decision in Capitol Records v ReDigi issued December 2018 did not attract anywhere near the same attention as the 2015 trial decision. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 10:56 am
" Prigg v. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 4:55 am
” Hivley now stands in direct contradiction to the opinion of the 11th Circuit in Evans v. [read post]
18 May 2016, 5:40 pm
” Shepherd v. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 2:46 pm
Although there is no international framework on the requirement of fixation, in English law the work has to be fixed in some material form, such as a film. [read post]
17 May 2024, 5:45 am
The ruling yesterday in Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) v. [read post]
5 May 2019, 9:10 am
” Sansone v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 1:23 pm
For example, in Lucasfilm v Ainsworth [2011] UKSC 39 the Supreme Court held that acts of copyright infringement in a non-EU country under foreign copyrights can be determined by the English courts. [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 1:19 pm
Foxworth v. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 3:45 am
First up is Montgomery v. [read post]
29 Aug 2006, 10:20 am
The rule of necessity is an ancient law that was part of the English common law and that has been traced back to 1430. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 4:31 am
Lord Eassie went on to state at para. 48 of the Court’s judgment: “. . . we for our part do not see any reason why in ordinary, contemporary English usage ‘leave’ in this context should not simply connote a period in which the employee is free from work commitment. [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 8:07 pm
Sweet.I'm calling it Judge Smith's most important contribution to the English language. [read post]
23 Mar 2007, 1:30 pm
I'm talking English and citing cases and understand precedent and the like, so I am "competent" in a way. [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 3:16 pm
Even though Ibarra speaks Spanish, he repeated his request in English. [read post]
5 Mar 2021, 1:02 pm
This comes in a written judgment ([2021] EWHC 510 (Ch)) peppered with language which, from an English judge, usually indicates contempt or irritation. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 8:49 am
I do believe that Brown v. [read post]
