Search for: "Fanning v. Fanning" Results 4421 - 4440 of 4,471
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Feb 2007, 5:50 am
Judge Padovano dissented, arguing that this case was constitutionally indistinguishable from the Florida Supreme Court's decision in B.B. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2007, 4:23 pm
Loyal readers will know that I'm a big fan of Justice Butz. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 12:24 am
DISTRICT COURTEASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKConstitutional LawLawyer-Martial Arts Fan's Complaint Over Ban On 'Chuka Sticks' in Home Possession Dismissed Maloney v. [read post]
24 Jan 2007, 12:34 am
DISTRICT COURTEASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKConstitutional LawLawyer-Martial Arts Fan's Complaint Over Ban On 'Chuka Sticks' in Home Possession Dismissed Maloney v. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 8:23 am
United States, No. 06-5618 (cert. granted, Nov. 3, 2006); and Rita v. [read post]
19 Jan 2007, 8:31 am
  Consider the impact that solos have had on lawyer marketing (it was, after all, a solo who pushed ahead with Bates v. [read post]
19 Jan 2007, 3:43 am
MIPTC's regular readers know that I'm a fan of Paul Levine's writing, and especially his Solomon v. [read post]
17 Jan 2007, 7:54 pm
Dennis Crouch summarizes oral arguments for the upcoming KSR v. [read post]
16 Jan 2007, 12:47 pm
When I first started teaching two years ago, I was a big fan of open book exams -- real life is open book, so why shouldn't exams be open book? [read post]
14 Jan 2007, 11:01 pm
Private lawyers get better results not because they're better lawyers, but because defendants think they're better lawyers and are willing to pay for the difference.At Fight 'Em 'Til We Can't, tc has this conclusion:Whatever the case, prominent articles like this that speak to a national audience and say that public defenders aren't as "good" as private counsel are bound to fan the flames of PD-critics who claim we're not "real lawyers. [read post]
10 Jan 2007, 2:38 pm
  As the Seventh Circuit Blog has noted here, Judge Posner takes on these issues through a strong panel opinion in US v. [read post]