Search for: "Gunning v. Doe"
Results 4421 - 4440
of 5,329
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 May 2019, 10:53 am
For example, right in the beginning of the book, on page 4, Jacobson discusses the case of Rollins v. [read post]
13 Apr 2008, 9:12 pm
See Thoughts on United States v. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 7:02 am
In McMiller v. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 8:00 am
See Related Blog Posts: Nalwa v. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 6:39 pm
Appropriately, the swing vote of Justice Kennedy placed him squarely in the middle between prosecution and defendants, casting 12 votes in favor of each.Despite his even-handedness in voting, Kennedy wrote two of the most controversial criminal case opinions this year, Boumediene, on the habeas rights for Guantanamo detainees, and Kennedy v. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 12:03 pm
What this means for other pending cases, such as Yates v. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 9:36 am
No Contest Plea RejectedThe case decided last week is State v. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 11:28 am
§ 13-412 – Arizona’s duress statute State v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 7:22 pm
In Pure Power Boot Camp v. [read post]
18 Apr 2009, 11:17 am
Will EPA and the states be required to address greenhouse gas emissions in federal Title V permits? [read post]
1 Feb 2014, 4:04 pm
The Louisiana Supreme Court didn’t specifically define what these terms mean, but it did cite Grutter v. [read post]
17 Jun 2012, 4:44 pm
While section 45 does not criminalize information exchanges themselves, the risk of such exchanges between competitors, without appropriate safeguards, is two-fold: first, exchanging (or discussing) competitively sensitive information may result in an agreement that contravenes section 45 (e.g., a price-fixing agreement); and second, an information exchange may be used by a court, the Competition Bureau or a private plaintiff to infer the existence of an agreement that violates section 45… [read post]
When Police Conduct a Post Arrest Search Without an Arrest: Challenging Illegal Searches in New York
20 Jan 2012, 2:57 am
Merely because a defendant can be arrested, but is in fact not, does not give the police the authority to conduct a post arrest search. [read post]
17 Oct 2012, 2:05 pm
Why does anyone care? [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 7:32 am
First, his lawyers contend that he is severely mentally ill and does not have a rational understanding of the reason he will be executed. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 3:58 pm
Riley challenged this action as racially discriminatory under Batson v. [read post]
15 Oct 2011, 3:48 pm
The Supreme Court's ruling on June 27 in Brown v. [read post]
5 May 2008, 3:05 am
This seems reasonable; after all, the law generally allows a person who has a gun pointed at her to shoot 1st, and not to wait for the assailant to shoot her before she may act to defend herself. [read post]
18 May 2012, 8:52 am
On appeal, the Fourth Circuit reversed, in United States v. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 5:50 pm
In Schoeps v. [read post]
