Search for: "Head v. Head" Results 4421 - 4440 of 19,775
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jan 2018, 1:49 pm by Mark L. McNamara and Collin R. Melancon
On January 22, 2018, the United States Supreme Court granted review of the Petitioner’s writ of certiorari in Weyerhaeuser Co. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 6:30 am by Tom Pritchard
Court of Appeal decision In overturning the decision of first instance, Lord Justice Clark (with whom Lady Justice Gloster and Lord Justice Patten agreed) relied on the following reasons: In reviewing the case law regarding contractual interpretation (Arnold v Britton [2015] UKSC 36 and Gan Insurance Co Ltd v Tai Ping Insurance Co Ltd [2001] CLC 1, 103 being particularly significant) it can be said that “the clearer the language the less appropriate it may be to construe or… [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 8:05 pm by INFORRM
  In all other respects Flood upheld and applied the principles set out by the House of Lords in Reynolds v The Times and Jameel v Wall Street Journal. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 6:57 am by Kyle Schrodi and Chas Kidwell
In order to alleviate some of these risks, potential buyers need to address these considerations head-on during the due diligence and negotiation process. [read post]
27 Aug 2021, 9:48 am by John Jascob
On remand, the district court should consider all record evidence relevant to the impact (or lack thereof) of Goldman’s statements on its stock price (Arkansas Teacher Retirement System v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 12:42 pm
 However, the parties will have to await the decision in the Actavis v Sanofi reference before they can see what the future of their case looks like. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
In my view, it may be questioned whether X was justified in X v Twitter. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
Robert Sharp was the Head of Campaigns at English PEN from 2009-18, during which time he was one of the managers of the Libel Reform Campaign. [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 8:46 pm
She banged a second grade classmate's head against a computer monitor for refusing to give up the computer at recess. [read post]
24 May 2007, 5:20 am
The LCJ has made the point that H M Courts service is under the control of Lord Falconer at The Ministry of Justice and argues that the duty of the Courts Service to provide enough courts and resources should be owed, now, to the Lord Chief Justice, given that The Lord Chancellor is no longer head of the judiciary. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 10:08 am by Marty Schwimmer
Peter Venkman’s voice in my head saying “You’re right, no human would stack books that way. [read post]