Search for: "Held v. State"
Results 4421 - 4440
of 82,195
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2021, 9:24 am
The Circuit had previously held that a completed Hobbs Act robbery is a “crime of violence,” United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2015, 4:07 pm
In Moses v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 8:17 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 4:31 pm
On 19 January 2016 the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in R (on application of Miranda) v Secretary of State for the Home Department ([2016] EWCA Civ 6). [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 7:41 am
In Reed v. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 10:27 am
” Wesolowski v. [read post]
27 Feb 2007, 6:02 am
The Court held, "the Due Process Clause prohibits a State from punishing an individual without first providing that individual with an opportunity to present every available defense. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 3:38 pm
In Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 1:46 am
HELD – The Supreme Court unanimously allows the appeal. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 5:30 am
Missouri v. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 1:48 pm
Phillips Petroleum Co. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 11:58 pm
The Court accepts the federal version of this argument even when the conditions bear only the most attenuated relationship to the expenditure of federal money -- indeed, even when the conditions primarily affect how the states spend their own revenue, as the Court held in Sabri v. [read post]
4 Jul 2021, 11:33 am
[v] https://www.boem.gov/renewable-energy/state-activities/gulf-mexico-gom-intergovernmental-renewable-energy-task-force. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 7:37 am
Supreme Court held that even though Congress designated certain state law counterclaims as “core” proceedings, Article III of the U.S. [read post]
17 Sep 2007, 3:00 am
V. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 1:37 pm
United States, 516 U.S. 29 (1995), the Court expressly held that there is no Sixth Amendment right to a jury verdict in a criminal forfeiture proceeding. [read post]
29 Nov 2015, 9:34 pm
Thus, it said, a new trial had to be held to set the amount of damages. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 1:27 pm
The United States Supreme Court has just issued an immigration related decision that breaths a whisper of common sense back into the interpretation of our United States immigration laws.In Carachuri-Rosendo v. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 10:39 pm
The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit recently held that Major League Baseball's licensing of team logos was subject to rule of reason review under Section 1 of the Sherman Act. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 3:23 pm
(Eugene Volokh) So the California Supreme Court unanimously held Monday, in Martinez v. [read post]
