Search for: "House v. House" Results 4421 - 4440 of 41,325
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Oct 2007, 10:03 pm
In Telstra Corporation Limited v Minister for Communications, Information Technology and the Arts (No. 2) [2007] FCA 1445, Telstra sought to prevent disclosure of documents produced by in-house lawyers. [read post]
19 Dec 2015, 6:53 am by Giles Peaker
In Secretary of State v MS and Inverclyde Council (Housing and council tax benefits : payments that are eligible for HB) [2014] UKUT 465 (AAC) the Upper Tribunal overturned an FTT decision reversing the imposition of a 14% bedroom tax. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 2:11 am by Dave
In Guiste v Lambeth LBC (2019) EWCA Civ 1758, the Court of Appeal returned again to the meaning of Lord Neuberger’s eliptical phrase in Hotak v Southwark LBC that, for the purposes of the homelessness provisions in the Housing Act 1996, vulnerability meant being significantly more vulnerable than ordinarily vulnerable as a result of being made homeless. [read post]
13 Jun 2007, 1:09 pm
  But the issue merits another spotlight today following a strong concurring opinion from Judge Hill of the Eleventh Circuit in US v. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 2:29 pm by Giles Peaker
Jarvis v Evans & Anor (2020) EWCA Civ 854 The question for the Court of Appeal on this second appeal was does failing to be licensed under the Housing (Wales) Act 2014 prevent a landlord from serving any notice seeking possession, or just a section 21 notice? [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 1:43 pm by Giles Peaker
But rent arrears will accrue during that time (as it is housing benefit that is capped in practice). [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 2:46 pm by Giles Peaker
The Circuit Judge took into account that under a secure tenancy a landlord would have an implied right of access to carry out works to avoid injury ( McAuley v Bristol CC (1992) QB 134 and Lee v Leeds CC (2002) 1 WLR 1488 ). [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 2:37 am
  In a case which has more of the surreal about it, Kenneth Parker QC, sitting then as a Deputy Judge, had to decide whether to grant leave to a litigant in person to challenge Octavia Housing and Care’s allocations policy as it applied to that particular litigant in person (who did not challenge the lawfulness of Octavia’s lettings policy [and by extension, Locata, the West London sub-regional CBL scheme to which Octavia Hill subscribes]): R(Fidelis-Auma)… [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 1:43 pm by J
The Legal Action Group, that lovely group of people who publish the books we all use, as well as the wonderful Legal Action magazine have launched a new housing law blog, here. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 1:43 pm by J
The Legal Action Group, that lovely group of people who publish the books we all use, as well as the wonderful Legal Action magazine have launched a new housing law blog, here. [read post]