Search for: "House v. House" Results 4421 - 4440 of 41,223
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Apr 2022, 8:16 am by Richard Hunt
Such damages are also available to victims of discrimination under the Fair Housing Act and under Titles I and II of the ADA. [read post]
4 Apr 2022, 8:55 pm by Lawrence Solum
This Article will bolster this argument by addressing the implications of Carpenter v. [read post]
4 Apr 2022, 8:00 am by INFORRM
This followed evidence provided by journalists and lawyers to the House of Lords Communications and Digital Committee on 31 March 2022 that the impact of SLAPP cases went deeper than court cases, with pre-court intimidation and the threat of costly legal proceedings meaning countless articles never get published. [read post]
3 Apr 2022, 12:59 pm by Giorgio Luceri
This question was recently answered in a judgment of the CJEU in Case C-183/21 (Globus v. [read post]
3 Apr 2022, 12:41 pm by Giles Peaker
    The post Service and admin charges – from the Upper Tribunal appeared first on Nearly Legal: Housing Law News and Comment. [read post]
3 Apr 2022, 11:07 am by Giles Peaker
It could not be said in this case that the enquiries made were such that no reasonable housing authority could have been satisfied as to their scope and scale, R v Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea, ex p Bayani (1990) 22 H.L.R. 406. [read post]
1 Apr 2022, 9:00 am
Today's advance release landlord/tenant law opinion: Housing Authority v. [read post]
1 Apr 2022, 8:22 am by HRWatchdog
Supreme Court rules on another arbitration-related case, Viking River Cruises, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2022, 6:14 am by John Floyd
  Schedule V   The substances on this schedule have a low potential for abuse and usually consist of substances that are preparations containing narcotics. [read post]
31 Mar 2022, 11:22 am by Florian Mueller
The fact that Philips lost two of its patents-in-suit in Germany (in one nullity proceeding it gave up, and in another there had already been a negative preliminary opinion) shows that the right of a defendant--under Huawei v. [read post]