Search for: "Husband (S) v. Wife (S)"
Results 4421 - 4440
of 6,180
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Feb 2023, 10:30 am
In Emerson, the family court granted a temporary injunction based on very loose evidence of strife between the husband and wife with no finding of family violence or future danger to the wife or daughter. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 12:29 pm
The dispute was protracted largely because the husband, under Belgian law, purported to revoke all gifts he had given to the wife during their marriage. [read post]
27 May 2015, 9:48 am
Consider, for instance, In re Blanchflower (N.H. 2003): The [husband] filed for divorce from the [wife] on grounds of irreconcilable differences. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 1:40 pm
First, a contrary holding would produce absurd results, most notably by criminalizing a wide swath of innocuous conduct such as a husband allowing his wife to check his email account or a parent logging in to monitor her children's activities on social media sites like Facebook or Snapchat. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 3:16 pm
V. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 9:49 am
The wife also sought enforcement of the out of state alimony agreement/judgment via garnishment of husband’s retirement benefits (called a QDRO). [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 11:19 am
The obligation terminated upon the death of either party, the remarriage of the wife, or the youngest child’s graduation from high school. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 9:45 am
” The complaint in B.L.R. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 7:32 am
The opinion said that a plan administrator properly refused to enforce a waiver that a former wife had made in a divorce case of her pension rights, because that conflicted with what the former husband had provided in plan documents. [read post]
6 Nov 2022, 10:44 am
“[A] wife can effectively bind herself during the lifetime of her husband to accept the provisions of her husband’s will and thereby be estopped from renouncing it after his death. [read post]
26 Nov 2010, 7:15 am
So, consider a real case, Aqel v. [read post]
16 May 2011, 8:38 am
"So said Mr Justice Peter Jackson, giving judgment in the case Mekarska (Wife) v Ruiz (Husband) [2011] EWHC 913 (Fam). [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 12:04 am
The Husband's share of the equity in the parties' real estate is Twenty Five Thousand Dollars ($25,000.00). [read post]
16 May 2016, 3:28 am
The underlying controversy concerned the enforceability of a contract to sell all of the partnership’s realty to an outside buyer for $5.9 million, pitting the other 50% partner and the ex-wife with 25% — both of whom authorized the contract — against the ex-husband with his 25% remainder interest who refused to authorize the sale unless he received 50% of the sale proceeds — effectively reneging on his divorce… [read post]
5 Jul 2015, 11:45 am
Her husband, who had been in a nearby restroom, sustained only minor injuries. [read post]
4 May 2011, 7:44 am
In Calhoun v. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 11:39 am
" An earlier report on the case can be read HERE and more on the history of Arakin Ltd’s dispute with Tods Murray can be found at a website on the case, here : Tods Murray v Arakin [read post]
28 May 2011, 4:23 pm
Mealy's loss. [read post]
27 Jun 2021, 4:12 pm
Alsawwah v. [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 1:56 pm
The government in the past has submitted in court that “living together as partners and having sexual relationship by same sex individuals is not comparable with the Indian family unit concept of a husband, a wife and children which necessarily presuppose a biological man as a ‘husband’, a biological woman as a ‘wife’ and the children born out of the union between the two”. [read post]
