Search for: "In Re: White v."
Results 4421 - 4440
of 4,470
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Feb 2007, 6:39 am
Earlier: Charney v. [read post]
5 Feb 2007, 12:15 am
Strang, The (Re)Turn to History in Religion Clause Law and Scholarship, (Notre Dame Law Review, Vol. 81, No. 5, p. 1697, 2006).Gerard V. [read post]
4 Feb 2007, 11:59 pm
Clark Martin, who retired from Vinson & Elkins on Jan. 1, says among those planning to join Kelly Hart as Houston partners are two V&E partners who are close to that firm's mandatory retirement age of 67, and former Enron Corp. general counsel James V. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 2:08 pm
* HER, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2007, 9:30 pm
We're expected to disregard what our own reading of the text of the Constitution tells us - who're you going to believe, me or your lying eyes? [read post]
1 Feb 2007, 11:06 am
The pre-motion conference in connection with defendant's contemplated motion to dismiss complaint in Warner v. [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 9:00 pm
DeBenedetto v. [read post]
24 Jan 2007, 9:13 pm
Lessig trying to re-try Elred. [read post]
24 Jan 2007, 6:15 pm
" (TTABlogged here).Standard Knitting, Ltd. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 4:02 pm
In Capital v. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 6:22 pm
Melton wrote members of Congress earlier this month to complain that the White House domestic policy office's report "Advancing Stem Cell Science Without Destroying Human Life" was a "misuse and mis [read post]
18 Jan 2007, 12:26 pm
We now interrupt your regularly scheduled programming of Charney v. [read post]
16 Jan 2007, 8:21 pm
Earlier: Prior coverage of Charney v. [read post]
16 Jan 2007, 4:04 am
That question was recently put to the test in the case of McKesson Information Solutions, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2007, 10:34 am
It also seems to me that today's students -- this is certainly true of my law students, both black and white -- no longer really grasp the reality of the pre-Civil Rights era. [read post]
14 Jan 2007, 11:01 pm
Private lawyers get better results not because they're better lawyers, but because defendants think they're better lawyers and are willing to pay for the difference.At Fight 'Em 'Til We Can't, tc has this conclusion:Whatever the case, prominent articles like this that speak to a national audience and say that public defenders aren't as "good" as private counsel are bound to fan the flames of PD-critics who claim we're not… [read post]
14 Jan 2007, 9:47 am
Roe v. [read post]
11 Jan 2007, 6:19 am
If you're not one of those people and you're flipping out because you can't understand why Americans -- despite the poll numbers -- seem to accept the President's decisions nonetheless, you probably will only hoot with derision if I say I understand how you feel. [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 5:17 am
In NFL v. [read post]
8 Jan 2007, 7:33 am
But, if you are amongst the seven people that have not seen the Saddam Execution Video, here is a re-mix of it. [read post]
