Search for: "LEAD CLASS PLAINTIFFS" Results 4421 - 4440 of 6,555
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Aug 2011, 9:39 am by Matt C. Bailey
Thus, although Pitts's claims "are not 'inherently transitory' as a result of being time sensitive, they are 'acutely susceptible to mootness' in light of [the defendant's] tactic of 'picking off' lead plaintiffs with a Rule 68 offer to avoid a class action. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 1:02 am by Kevin LaCroix
The August 8, 2011 press release of the New York Comptroller, acting on behalf of the New York State pension funds as lead plaintiff, can be found here. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 10:50 pm by The Complex Litigator
Thus, although Pitts’s claims “are not ‘inherently transitory’ as a result of being time sensitive, they are ‘acutely susceptible to mootness’ in light of [the defendant’s] tactic of ‘picking off’ lead plaintiffs with a Rule 68 offer to avoid a class action. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 10:01 am
The substantive provisions require both that the plaintiff be within a protect class (sex, race, color, religion and national origin) and that the employer conduct affect the terms and conditions of employment. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 9:50 am by Mike Scarcella
“The work effort of class counsel in this case has already been enormous,” the plaintiffs’ lawyers said. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 9:15 am
However, after discovery, when Plaintiffs did in fact renew their motion, the Court renewed its denial of the Rule 23 certification, stating that, "certifying a Rule 23 class as to plaintiffs' state-law claims would lead to a significant expansion of the scope of fact discovery, which, in turn, would likely substantially delay trial on plaintiffs' claims arising under the [FLSA] . . . [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 1:49 am by Kevin LaCroix
The lead plaintiffs’ August 5, 2011 memorandum in support of the motion to approve the settlement can be found here, and the parties’ settlement stipulation can be found here. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 1:49 am by Kevin LaCroix
The lead plaintiffs’ August 5, 2011 memorandum in support of the motion to approve the settlement can be found here, and the parties’ settlement stipulation can be found here. [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 11:57 pm by Lara
  Comcast claims that the “No Extra Charge” claim is literally false and that consumers would only learn this upon reading various forms of media that ultimately lead to explanation of the promotion on DirectTV’s website. [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 10:03 pm by Sam E. Antar
If it weren't for the heroic efforts of the FBI, SEC, Postal Inspector's Office, US Attorney's Office, and class action plaintiff's lawyers who investigated, prosecuted, and sued me, I would still be the criminal CFO of Crazy Eddie today. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 3:03 pm
The following is a primer based upon the author's experiences handling numerous MDL cases, both as class counsel and as appointed members on the Plaintiff's Steering Committee and various subcommittees. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 3:03 pm
The following is a primer based upon the author's experiences handling numerous MDL cases, both as class counsel and as appointed members on the Plaintiff's Steering Committee and various subcommittees. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 12:55 pm by Luke Green
Today, lead plaintiff counsel in In Re Wachovia Preferred Securities and Bond/Notes Litigation announced a $627 million settlement against Wells Fargo, who acquired Wachovia in early October 2008 for $12.7 billion. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 4:56 am by Sean Wajert
  Typically, plaintiffs try not to allege details in this area for fear of undermining their class certification arguments. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 3:21 am by Russ Bensing
  If we did, we’d file a Federal class-action suit against the hotel. [read post]