Search for: "MATTER OF A W A V"
Results 4421 - 4440
of 8,372
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Oct 2014, 8:23 am
[1] Tsosie v. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 10:42 am
Douglas W. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 4:30 am
State Bank v. [read post]
19 Oct 2014, 9:01 pm
Another peculiarity is what happened during oral argument in Hamdan v. [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 9:38 am
Within a matter of minutes, a Baltimore city police officer arrived and conducted a canine inspection of the vehicle exterior. [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 7:47 am
About two-thirds into the opening argument in Jennings v. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 4:41 pm
"Under Florida law, "[w] cannot overlook the inexorable and significant fact that, because cell phones are indispensable to so many people and are normally carried on one’s person, cell phone tracking can easily invade the right to privacy in one’s home or other private areas, a matter that the government cannot always anticipate and one which, when it occurs, is clearly a Fourth Amendment violation. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 5:51 pm
This morning I attended the Supreme Court argument in Teva v. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 5:24 pm
As noted in People v Paul, whether a foundation for the experience and training is set forth or not, it seems that, as a matter of fundamental fairness, defendant should not have to proceed to trial in a narcotics case unless and until a laboratory report has been filed by the People. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 9:26 am
Id. at *5 (citing Medtronic, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 4:24 am
Supreme Court case is Sierra Chemical v. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 4:45 am
” Alvi’s Drift Wine International v. von Stiehl Winery, Cancellation No. 92058100 (September 12, 2014) [not precedential]. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 4:28 am
That is [w]hat the defendant calls himself. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 12:51 pm
Not sure he has new things to say about that general topic.Cathay Smith: In the ideal situation, would Rogers v. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 2:10 pm
“[W]hether providing information to the FDA would have changed the FDA’s conclusion” was an entirely different matter, and was “a fraud-on-the-FDA theory which was rejected by the Supreme Court in Buckman. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 11:41 am
As a constitutional matter, bans on gay marriage are at a bare minimum subject to skeptical scrutiny under United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 9:12 am
To be recoverable, a medical expense must be both incurred and reasonable.Howell v. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 8:46 am
Though the state supreme court held that, as a matter of state law, the trial court erred in conducting the hearing ex parte, it determined that the errors were harmless. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 1:16 pm
Under this approach, the Sixth Circuit would consider itself bound by the one-sentence order in 1972’s Baker v. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 7:15 am
She wrote: [C]onsider the importance of the 1980 Supreme Court decision in Diamond v. [read post]
