Search for: "Mark C. Good"
Results 4421 - 4440
of 5,970
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Aug 2011, 9:08 pm
William C. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 10:59 am
By David C. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 12:25 am
A likelihood of dilution requires affirmative answers to three questions: (a) whether the Opposer’s mark is famous; (b) whether the mark became famous prior to the Applicant’s application filing date; and (c) whether the Applicant’s mark is likely to blur (reduce) the distinctiveness of Opposer’s mark. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 2:38 pm
Copyright © 2010 Mark Bennett. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 2:13 pm
If all else fails, grab your yoga mat and opt for Plan C. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 8:35 am
§ 325E.37, subd. 6(c). [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 4:19 am
With good reason, obviously. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 3:35 am
The Board next looked to the six factors set forth in Section 43(c)(2)(B). [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 11:31 pm
Peter C. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 10:23 am
(3) Subject to the provisions of clauses (a), (c) and (i) of sub-section (1), any information relating to any occurrence, event or matter which has taken place, occurred or happened twenty years before the date on which any request is made under secton 6 shall be provided to any person making a request under that section: Provided that where any question arises as to the date from which the said period of twenty years has to be computed, the decision of the Central Government shall… [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 12:25 pm
How do they vary by filing basis, type of mark, country of origin, type of applicant, class of goods? [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 10:29 am
As usual, Perfect 10 apparently failed to send a proper 512(c)(3) takedown notice. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 8:41 am
The Panel therefore finds that Respondent’s use of the disputed domain name is neither a Policy ¶ 4(c)(i) bona fide offering of goods or services nor a Policy ¶ 4(c)(iii) legitimate noncommercial or fair use. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 8:00 pm
c. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 4:16 am
Coach had claimed likely confusion with, and likely dilution of, Opposer's COACH mark for leather goods and various other consumer items, and had further claimed that Applicant Triumph Learning's mark is merely descriptive of its services. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 6:58 pm
§ 153.133(c) (2008). [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 1:53 pm
Thank you.PayPal is a registered mark in the U.S. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 7:28 am
. “vituperation,” which has been decried for generations, including 1906 when the Court in Pittsburgh C., C. and St. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 6:38 am
Developed in Cuba circa 1930, [it's good stuff]. [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 11:24 pm
Polo Publicity and Trade LTD (IP Factor) Netherlands Refill a Heineken cask with Olm: trade mark infringement? [read post]
