Search for: "Matter of Kennedy"
Results 4421 - 4440
of 4,836
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Oct 2019, 6:00 am
That sentence is a good reminder for students that, regardless of whether a warrant is required, probable cause is always required for an exigent circumstance to apply—no matter the category of exigency. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 3:17 pm
”[6] The question thus arises: who were those “reputable” dealers, and how does it matter that a private purchaser like White is in good faith? [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 9:42 am
Racketeering activity is defined as any act or threat involving murder, kidnapping, gambling, arson, bribery, robbery, extortion, or dealing in obscene matter or a controlled substance, together with a vast list of additional crimes ranging from misuse of a passport to criminal infringement of copyright. 18 U.S.C. [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 6:00 am
”[26] Ratificationists did not necessarily act “solely out of self-interest,”[27] for creditors and government bondholders reasonably believed “government must pay their debts—both as a matter of justice and as a means of maintaining a strong credit rating. [read post]
3 May 2016, 2:41 pm
Thomas Kennedy, American Society of Media Photographers: Concerns w/512 going forward. [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 7:54 pm
He showed a quote to that effect and noted that it came from President Kennedy in 1963. [read post]
15 Aug 2024, 6:00 am
For the Balkinization Symposium on Alison L. [read post]
2 May 2016, 2:50 pm
Session 2: Notice-and-Takedown Process—Service Provider Response and Counter-Notifications Official description: Handling of and response to notices, including timing and notices from high-volume senders; sending and handling of counter-notifications; volume of notices and counter-notifications; costs and burdens on large- and small-scale service providers; role of automation, including filtering technologies; noncompliant notices and misuse of notice process; rejection of notices;… [read post]
10 Jul 2022, 6:30 am
The events of the past month, including, most notably, the Dobbs case reversing Roe, has exposed the hollowness of the hope that what used to be called “reasoned elaboration” would, as somewhat pathetically asserted in the famous plurality opinion in Casey in by Justices O’Connor, Kennedy, and Souter, bring the national debate to an end because the Supreme Court, had, after all, issued its ukase. [read post]
19 May 2024, 1:04 pm
It mattered. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 9:42 am
Every now and then we run into a decision that we think is wrong in so many different ways that we call it an example of “spherical error” – that is, error no matter how one looks at it. [read post]
15 Feb 2025, 10:30 am
His Valentines Day speech to the collectively august body of people who matter had the desired effect--both on the bodies onto which it was projected, and those for whom it was meant to be affirm solidarity within shared cognitive cages in need of expansion. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 3:00 am
The actual arguments the parties have offered to the Court in the Affordable Care Act case the Court will hear next Tuesday bear little resemblance to the “Congress requiring everyone to eat broccoli” caricatures that have dominated much of the public debate. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 10:24 am
But the truth, for those who care to think about it, and to think about it without being blinded by knee jerkism, is that these matters are not what is at stake. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 5:06 am
” The rule applied “even where the program matter is furnished without charge or at a nominal charge as an inducement to the broadcast of the program. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 2:11 pm
NOT THE LAST WORD ON THE MATTER Because the appeal resulted in the reversal of a summary judgment in favor of the lawfirm defendants, the case will go back to the trial court for further litigation in light of the appellate court's resolution of the legal issues raised at the summary judgment stage. [read post]
17 Jan 2025, 6:37 pm
Pix credit here (Oh Brother Where Art Thou (Movie 2000) In a way it doesn't matter. [read post]
8 Jan 2025, 5:55 am
Kennedy, Jr., and Tulsi Gabbard, among others—alienation may set in among his most marginal backers. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 11:53 am
As a matter of history, Supreme Court Justices rarely lose retention elections unless they have written controversial opinions or if the court itself has recently been involved in some sort of controversy. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 4:47 am
Votes to Accept the Case Yes: Justices Kennedy, French, DeWine, Fischer*, and former Justice O’Donnell *Would accept the appeal on proposition of law No. 1 only. [read post]
