Search for: "Mr. Smith"
Results 4421 - 4440
of 5,813
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2010, 8:00 am
Mr. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 7:09 am
Smith and Dr. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 4:21 am
Discerning readers will however note that this issue also lay at the heart of last week's Patents Court ruling of Mr Justice Arnold in KCI Licensing Inc and others v Smith and Nephew plc and others [2010] EWHC 1487 (Pat), noted here by the IPKat. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 10:38 pm
In addition, there was a tribute to The Honourable Mr. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 7:45 pm
The Vatican, for its part, is not eager to see the Vicar of Christ sitting in Mr. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 12:53 pm
And there is only one oblique and pretty funny dig at Christianity from Mr. and Mrs. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 8:37 am
Defendant respectfully submits that Mr. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 4:54 am
While the rest of the world has its eyes trained on the United States, desperately seeking first sight of In re Bilski, patent litigation is still taking place elsewhere, as is evidenced by last week's carefully-framed decision in KCI Licensing Inc and others v Smith and Nephew plc and others [2010] EWHC 1487 (Pat), a ruling of Mr Justice Arnold (Patents Court for England and Wales).Right: the IPKat is all in favour of dressings that don't press on his earsThis case, the… [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 12:59 pm
As Smith J. noted in O’Rourke v. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 4:13 pm
Mr. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 10:46 am
We regret that in the case of Mr. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 10:53 am
Make no mistake about it, Mr. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 7:35 am
Smith’s charitable foundation. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 7:31 am
Smith v. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 4:55 am
"Judge gives word its ordinary meaning" was the striking headline of the IPKat's post last summer (here) on the decision of Mr Justice Mann (Patents Court, England and Wales) in Occlutech GmbH v AGA Medical Corp; Dot Medical Ltd [2009] EWHC 2013 (Ch). [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 11:18 am
Smith's documents ("And you certainly need to put somebody on a plane to go out and see Mr. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 10:54 am
Deviation from accepted accounting principles is prima facie evidence that the accounts do not present a true and fair view of the assets and liabilities of the company or the group… Mr Glick drew our attention to the decision of the House of Lords in Smith New Court Securities Ltd v Citibank N.A., [1997] AC 254, in particular the speech of Lord Steyn at page 271, in support of the proposition that accounts properly prepared may subsequently turn out not to have… [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 2:03 pm
Mr. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 6:42 am
Mr. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 2:00 am
The three judges who ruled on the case were the two highest judges in the court – the Lord Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls – as well as Lady Justice Smith. [read post]
