Search for: "People v. Givens"
Results 4421 - 4440
of 17,550
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2008, 1:19 pm
As many people have already emailed me to tell me (alright, four people, all of them lovely), McCann v United Kingdom 19009/04 was handed down today. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm
As I explained in one of my earlier posts, several or all of the Justices might be inclined to decide the case on some ground that doesn’t require the Court to decide whether Donald Trump is eligible to be President, if such an “off-ramp” solution is legally available. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 8:28 am
As New York’s highest court, the Court of Appeals noted in Schneider v. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 8:47 am
Reed v. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 2:49 am
The purpose of the Act was to ensure that people who are at more risk of suffering harm when homeless are given accommodation. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 2:58 pm
Indeed, in Levin v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 7:37 pm
The recent City of Ontario v. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 7:33 am
Yordy v. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 3:41 pm
Research on prison nicknames: bestowed upon people, not given to themselves. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 2:59 am
Needless to say, there are quite a few “other” points in Rares J’s 115 paragraphs: Singtel Optus Pty Ltd v National Rugby League Investments Pty Ltd (No 2) [2012] FCA 34 For a more recent “no volitional act, therefore no infringement” case in the USA see Prof Goldman’s ‘Photobucket Qualifies for the 512(c) Safe Harbor (Again)–Wolk v. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 11:43 am
This is likely to be welcomed as most people had struggled to interpret the Judge's one set of terms position in a way which fitted in with commercial arms' length negotiations of complex licences. [read post]
26 Jan 2020, 4:24 pm
Ms Cadwalladr told the Press Gazette: “It’s very good news that he’s given up with two of [the claims] but it’s just ridiculous that he’s continuing with the other two. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 1:11 pm
Given their understanding of Congress’ limited criminal jurisdiction and the absence of an analogous dual-sovereign system in England, it is difficult to conclude that the People who ratified the Fifth Amendment understood it to prohibit prosecution by a State and the Federal Government for the same offense. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 11:14 am
To that end, I need to provide an accessible explanation of the importance of U.S. v. [read post]
16 May 2016, 12:29 pm
Additional Resources: “I had to wear Pampers”: The cruel reality the people who bring you cheap chicken allegedly endure, May 11, 2016, By Roberto A. [read post]
11 Sep 2011, 2:19 pm
Like many people, I have been thinking back to where I was on that day. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 12:50 pm
Constitution provides many protections designed to ensure criminal defendants are given a fair trial. [read post]
3 Apr 2025, 7:00 am
As the Oregon Supreme Court held in State ex rel Oregon State Bar v. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 8:20 pm
Supreme Court ruled 8-1 today in Rothgery v. [read post]
4 Dec 2015, 6:14 am
In reaching that conclusion, the Court explained that, in determining the validity of consent, `great significance [is] given to widely shared social expectations. [read post]
