Search for: "Root v. State"
Results 4421 - 4440
of 4,651
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Aug 2008, 2:43 am
– discussion of Washington Post article on Ismed’s efforts to promote follow-on biologics approval pathway: (Patent Baristas), (Patent Docs), US: Congressional fact-finding on follow-on biologics: (Patent Docs), US: David v Monsanto: Biotechnology patent ‘exhaustion’ after Quanta, Supreme Court petition: (Hal Wegner), US: Ulysses Pharmaceuticals announces issuance of patent for novel class of ant [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 2:29 am
Co. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 5:00 am
Is this (“Approval Ratings: The Public v. [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 12:48 am
And, As Judge Weinstein observed in United States v. [read post]
11 Aug 2008, 7:20 am
Arthur Andersen, S147190, the unanimous court held that a state statute with roots in 19th century laws gives California workers great freedom to switch jobs, to compete against old employers and to solicit former clients. [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 1:13 pm
" For the Roberts Court, the trend has its roots in Roberts' first term and the decision in Ayotte v. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 7:12 pm
D.C. v. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 5:33 pm
There is no topic that is more closely rooted in sex than biology -- yet the moment the lawyers move in, the sex moves out. [read post]
3 Aug 2008, 2:25 pm
Connecticut and Roe v. [read post]
2 Aug 2008, 12:54 am
: (Holman’s Biotech IP Blog), Daiichi’s open offer for 20% in Ranbaxy awaits Sebi nod: (GenericsWeb), Australia/India: Strides shows thumbs up for Indian generic industry acquiring controlling interest in Ascent: (Spicy IP), Europe: Significant date ahead for EU Paediatric Regulation: (SPC Blog), India: Grave diggers, ‘immoral’ patent and the National Biotech Regulatory Authority: (Spicy IP), UK: Monster trade mark infringement case: court reveals its thinking… [read post]
27 Jul 2008, 9:13 pm
See People v. [read post]
26 Jul 2008, 4:49 pm
Masquat v. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 10:58 pm
The Code of Guidance states that decisions should be made within 33 working days of application. [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 10:24 pm
In District of Columbia v. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 1:43 pm
Not a day goes by, it seems, without a constitutional wink to the right on guns (he thinks there is an individual right to own one), the wall of separation between church and state (he thinks it can be lowered), the Fourth Amendment prohibition on warrantless wiretapping (he's changed his position on FISA), and on the death penalty for noncapital child rape cases (he thinks it's constitutional) as well as a possible shift this week on the right to abortion (which could… [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 4:16 am
" (Gregg v. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 1:50 am
Agudo have posted an article titled "Individual Rights Under State Constitutions When the Fourteenth Amendment Was Ratified in 1868: What Rights are Deeply Rooted in American History and Tradition? [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 3:20 pm
This provides new and never before published evidence of why Brown v. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 5:00 am
Ct. 1057 (2007), State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2008, 4:51 pm
Reynolds itself, holding that the state secrets privilege is part of the federal common law, leaves little room for defendants’ argument that the state secrets privilege is actually rooted in the constitution. [read post]
