Search for: "SECTION 13 OFFICER" Results 4421 - 4440 of 7,762
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jun 2014, 9:23 am by Robert Kreisman
Pella Corp., et al., Nos. 13-2091, 13-2133, 13-2136, 13-2162 and 13-2202 (U.S. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 10:30 am by Cicely Wilson
The charges stemmed from a police officer’s recovery of a machete from Respondent. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 5:55 am by Doug Cornelius
The latter half of the Article concludes that much of the compliance officer’s work falls within two categories: corporate policing and corporate architecture. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 5:15 pm by azatty
Chair: Sonia Overholser, Department of the Interior, Phoenix Solicitor’s Office Who should attend? [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 5:15 pm by azatty
Chair: Sonia Overholser, Department of the Interior, Phoenix Solicitor’s Office Who should attend? [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 8:43 am by John Elwood
  Whitfield’s cert. petition asks whether Section 2113(e) “requires proof of more than a de minimis movement of the victim. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 8:50 am by Andrew Delaney
This matches the standard set out in Section 5233. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 8:17 am
  Richter does not teach or suggest that a first section of a flexible connector is made of a first material and a second section of that same connector is made of a second material [as required by claim 1]. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 6:36 am
According to Section 8(1)(i) of the RTI Act, Cabinet papers including the deliberations of the Council of Ministers and Secretaries and other officers are exempt from disclosure. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm by KC Johnson
’ (A day earlier, Wade Smith had testified about his April 13 meeting with Nifong and two other defense attorneys and said that he had ‘never experienced such behavior in his more than forty years of lawyering’ and that ‘it was clear Mr. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 12:39 pm
” So let me say in the most direct manner that it is deeply, profoundly, obviously undemocratic to limit speech about who to elect to public office. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 7:23 am
The followingsafeguards will exist:• The patent holder will have the opportunity to apply for a review of theopinion under section 74B of the Patents Act 1977 before any revocationaction is commenced (section 73(1B), as inserted by the IP Act). [read post]