Search for: "STATE v. JACKSON"
Results 4421 - 4440
of 6,530
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 May 2012, 7:53 am
Issued by: Jackson Mthembu African National Congress Enquiries: Jackson Mthembu 082 370 8401 Keith Khoza 082 823 9672 The Presidency similarly published a strongly worded statement the following day: Presidency disgusted at violation of President Zuma’s rights The Presidency is shocked and disgusted at the grotesque painting by Brett Murray depicting President Jacob Zuma in an offensive manner. [read post]
18 May 2012, 2:00 am
As to the question of whether a court order carries more weight than a Congressional order, I’m reminded of the apocryphal quotation attributed to President Andrew Jackson after the Supreme Court’s decision in Worcester v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 1:30 pm
by Lee DavisUS v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 5:23 am
State v. [read post]
16 May 2012, 7:20 pm
Please leave a comment to this article if you have any ideas.After a quick search, I was only able to find one reported case that mentions tower dumps - Jackson v. [read post]
16 May 2012, 7:15 pm
This posting was written by Jeffrey May, Editor of CCH Trade Regulation Reporter.An action brought by the State of Mississippi against companies that manufacture liquid crystal display (LCD) panels for conspiring to fix prices in violation of the Mississippi state law was remanded to state court by the federal district court in Jackson. [read post]
15 May 2012, 8:45 am
Latif v. [read post]
15 May 2012, 1:04 am
Following on Bahta & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 895 [Our report] and Lord Jackson’s view on JR costs, the Court of Appeal in M v London Borough of Croydon [2012] EWCA Civ 595 has given general guidance for awarding costs. [read post]
15 May 2012, 1:04 am
Following on Bahta & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 895 [Our report] and Lord Jackson’s view on JR costs, the Court of Appeal in M v London Borough of Croydon [2012] EWCA Civ 595 has given general guidance for awarding costs. [read post]
14 May 2012, 6:00 am
Iowa Supreme Court OpinionsMay 11, 2012No. 11–0525 STATE OF IOWA v. [read post]
11 May 2012, 5:18 pm
See State v. [read post]
10 May 2012, 7:03 pm
Jackson. [read post]
9 May 2012, 6:17 am
bit.ly/Jfeq4E (Tom Schober) IT and Legal Perspectives on Data Security - bit.ly/JxaydP (Stacy Jackson) IP: Examining the Risks Associated with Corporate Social Media Use – bit.ly/J0rEEK (Marcella Ballard, Deborah Feinblum) Keeping Secrets on Facebook - nyti.ms/JVKEq3 (Somini Sengupta) Lawyers and Social Media: What Could Possibly Go Wrong? [read post]
9 May 2012, 5:40 am
She believes that the bill is an attempt to ban abortions without directly challenging the 1973 United States Supreme Court decision of Roe v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 7:35 pm
The Sixth Circuit reversed and remanded for resentencing under the new crack guidelines in United States v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 2:31 pm
I figure phones will be ringing off the hook tomorrow in some offices, so let me give you the fast and dirty breakdown of United States v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 7:00 am
Wilkins))))STATE OF NEW YORK, et al., ))Plaintiffs, ))v. ) Civil Action No. 1:12-cv-00531) (consolidated) LISA P. [read post]
7 May 2012, 12:20 pm
Weltover and United States v. [read post]
6 May 2012, 10:25 am
The standard for removal and subsequent trial in absentia in both federal and U.S. military courts is Illinois v. [read post]
5 May 2012, 9:22 pm
In Estate of Muscle v. [read post]
