Search for: "State v. Settle"
Results 4421 - 4440
of 15,570
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jan 2021, 11:41 am
Supreme Court to hear Andrews v. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 5:00 am
Federal Circuit Nightmare in CLS Bank v. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 9:20 am
In Willingboro Mall v. [read post]
3 Sep 2024, 12:28 pm
In Reno v. [read post]
23 Aug 2018, 6:30 am
Judge Zloch followed suit in U.S. v. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 5:42 am
DTM Research, LLC v. [read post]
28 Sep 2018, 11:00 am
Duenez, 237 S.W.3d 680, 686 (Tex. 2007), the Texas Supreme Court stated that negligent entrustment is a form of vicarious liability. [read post]
14 May 2012, 8:46 pm
(E.g, Lopez v. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 3:29 am
Thus, absent an attorney-client relationship, a cause of action for legal malpractice cannot be stated (Baystone Equities, Inc. v Handel-Harbour, 27 AD3d 231 [2006]; Linden v Moskowitz, 294 AD2d 114, 115 [2002], lv denied 99 NY2d 505 [2003]). [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 8:15 am
Russel v Russel stated that situations in which discretion against arbitration should be exercised are ‘few and exceptional. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 12:37 pm
The payment and plan resolve the United States’ allegations that during the period from April 30, 2011, through April 30, 2013, CVS pharmacies failed to provide effective controls and procedures to guard against diversion when CVS allegedly failed to: (1) record the amount received and the date received of Schedule II drugs on DEA-222 Forms; (2) maintain DEA-222 Forms and keep them separate from other records; (3) record the date of acquisition of controlled substances in Schedules II… [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 12:37 pm
The payment and plan resolve the United States’ allegations that during the period from April 30, 2011, through April 30, 2013, CVS pharmacies failed to provide effective controls and procedures to guard against diversion when CVS allegedly failed to: (1) record the amount received and the date received of Schedule II drugs on DEA-222 Forms; (2) maintain DEA-222 Forms and keep them separate from other records; (3) record the date of acquisition of controlled substances in Schedules II… [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 2:58 am
The best statement of the rule is that a wrong-doer is responsible for the natural and proximate consequences of his [or her] misconduct' " (Battalla v State of New York, 10 NY2d 237, 240; see Derby v Prewitt, 12 NY2d 100, 105-106). [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 5:25 am
Evans v. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 5:25 am
Evans v. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 8:10 am
NHL has settled. [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 9:24 am
Second, the Court’s ruling treated Obergefell v. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 4:14 pm
Co. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 2:59 am
Plaintiffs sued, settled and sued again. [read post]
