Search for: "Thomas"
Results 4421 - 4440
of 66,719
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Apr 2023, 12:54 pm
Chief Justice John Roberts expressed “fundamental concerns” about class-action payouts to nonprofits in a case the court declined to review in 2013, and Justice Clarence Thomas did the same in a 2018 case. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 12:24 pm
” Justice Clarence Thomas was also troubled by this idea. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 12:14 pm
Justice Thomas concurred fully in the Court’s opinion but wrote separately to express “grave doubts about the constitutional propriety” of having agencies, not federal courts, adjudicating private rights, as compared to governmental privileges, and with only highly deferential judicial review at the end of the proceedings. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 10:25 am
Bloomberg notes that one of the whistleblowers represented by Kohn, Kohn & Colapinto is Apple whistleblower Thomas Le Bonniec who made allegations about Siri’s privacy practices. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 9:50 am
In recent days, there has been some talk about whether the Senate Judiciary Committee would invite Justice Thomas to testify, or potentially issue a subpoena. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 9:13 am
” Justices Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch have said they would like to revisit that standard. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 8:48 am
In past cases, Attorney Thomas Scolaro was able to prove that the design defect was related to the firing pin releasing without the trigger being pulled -that it could happen whether the safety was engaged or disengaged, which is a separate design defect- causing the firing pin to impact the primer and discharge the firearm unintentionally. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 8:29 am
Kacsmaryk’s ruling came alongside a contradicting ruling from district court Judge Thomas Rice in Washington state that blocked the FDA from limiting the availability of mifepristone throughout the country. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 6:47 am
As Justice Clarence Thomas noted in his concurrence, the appeals court must apply a highly deferential standard of review—treating the agency’s record as conclusive, provided there is substantial evidentiary support. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 6:41 am
However, she seemed to retreat from her position in responses to questions from Thomas and Justice Samuel Alito. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 5:47 am
Justice Clarence Thomas dissented in a solo opinion; Justice Samuel Alito dissented in an opinion joined by Justice Neil Gorsuch. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 5:06 am
When that happens, when you see yourself there, on that sad height, as Dylan Thomas once wrote, hyperventilating like the rest of them, the alarmism starting to earn the impressions that now matter to you so much more than speaking the truth ever did, then you’ll know your time as a free thinker is over, and that you are ready for fame. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 1:00 am
She joins Preet to discuss the recent controversy over Justice Thomas’ financial nondisclosures, the fast-moving Mifepristone case, and her new book, Nine Black Robes: Inside the Supreme Court's Drive to the Right and Its Historic Consequences. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 1:00 am
She joins Preet to discuss the recent controversy over Justice Thomas’ financial nondisclosures, the fast-moving Mifepristone case, and her new book, Nine Black Robes: Inside the Supreme Court's Drive to the Right and Its Historic Consequences. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 6:32 pm
Painter have a jurisprudence essay titled “So, Is Clarence Thomas at Real Risk Here? [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 6:13 pm
Nor did Justice Thomas. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 4:15 pm
The post Thomas Gaslighting And Contempt Galore — See Also appeared first on Above the Law. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 2:47 pm
Justices Thomas, who initiated the questioning for the Court, displayed some sympathy to the difficulty of requiring a company to defend its interpretation of ambiguous regulations. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 1:29 pm
In Driehaus, Justice Thomas wrote that an “allegation of future injury may suffice if the threatened injury is ‘certainly impending,’ or there is a ‘substantial risk’ that the harm will occur. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 1:29 pm
In Driehaus, Justice Thomas wrote that an “allegation of future injury may suffice if the threatened injury is ‘certainly impending,’ or there is a ‘substantial risk’ that the harm will occur. [read post]
