Search for: "Towns v. State"
Results 4421 - 4440
of 5,895
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 May 2011, 8:41 am
Smith In the six years since the landmark Kelo v. [read post]
16 May 2011, 3:35 am
As such, Kasper's summary judgment motion was untimely pursuant to the terms of the stipulation (see Miceli v State Farm Mut. [read post]
14 May 2011, 6:32 am
Van v. [read post]
13 May 2011, 9:52 am
Street down town [sic]. [read post]
10 May 2011, 7:57 am
Supreme Court's 2004 ruling in Banks v. [read post]
9 May 2011, 10:27 pm
Campbell v. [read post]
9 May 2011, 11:47 am
The case Singhaviroj v. [read post]
9 May 2011, 8:43 am
appeal from the judgment of the trial court affirming the decision of the defendant state board of labor relations (board) dismissing complaints brought by the union against the defendant town of Hamden (town). [read post]
9 May 2011, 5:48 am
“The cover page of the Vinchesi email stated `Mr. [read post]
6 May 2011, 4:52 pm
Levine v Town of Sterling, No. 18470 (Apr 12, 2011) // [read post]
5 May 2011, 6:36 pm
However the 1983 UK case of Merchandising Corporation of America v Harpbond, aka the Adam Ant case, may point that such a conclusion is not necessary easy to arrive at. [read post]
5 May 2011, 2:01 pm
United States v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 6:17 am
Responses to last week’s decision in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 3:55 am
Mandatory subjects of negotiationsCarmel PBA v PERB, 267 AD2d 858 The Carmel PBA case involves a “legal interpretation” made by the New York State Public Employment Relations Board [PERB]. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 12:42 pm
Detroit was the scene for a landmark eminent-domain case, Poletown v. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 5:17 am
” As the Appellate Division noted in Johnson v Town of Amherst, 74 AD3d 1896, having a residence in a jurisdiction is not always the same as having a domicle in that jurisdiction. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 7:37 pm
The Supreme Court will soon hear oral arguments in Sorrell v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 7:37 pm
The Supreme Court will soon hear oral arguments in Sorrell v. [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 8:05 pm
” Judge Major then ordered six of Qualcomm’s lawyers to be referred to the State Bar of California for investigation of their ethical violations and possible discipline. [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 4:18 am
” According to records obtained from Missouri’s Secretary of State, the St. [read post]