Search for: "Wells v. Heard*"
Results 4421 - 4440
of 9,181
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Oct 2014, 8:47 am
In Abbott Judge Hacon clarified that the £500,000 cap is pretty well set to cover everything, unless the parties agree to lift it.The government has been determined to encourage use of the courts by SMEs and litigants in person. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 11:19 am
In the absence of a glaring error by the Hearing Officer, this would have been against well-established principle. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 12:24 pm
Today the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) delivered its ruling in Case C‑583/12 Sintax [or, if you prefer, Syntax: the CJEU uses both spellings] Trading OÜ v Maksu- ja Tolliameti Põhja maksu- ja tollikeskus, a reference for a preliminary ruling from Estonia's Riigikohus. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 1:21 pm
Here are some other interesting pieces of news from the past week: The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Maryland v. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 1:23 pm
However, in the Access Copyright v. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 11:23 pm
I already discussed this in last week's report on a Nokia v. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 5:08 pm
These reports were referring to Edward Acuna v. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 8:12 am
That Friday, the court held a Motorola v. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 5:38 am
” Has the US Marshals Service never heard of Brady v. [read post]
19 Oct 2016, 8:28 am
The guest post is reproduced below (with a few formatting changes).Govindswamy v. [read post]
10 May 2021, 9:20 am
This is language from a US Supreme Court case, Graham v. [read post]
29 Apr 2025, 2:25 pm
Another day in our modern Supreme Court on Tuesday, as the argument in A.J.T. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 3:15 am
However it is also a name that has been heard to echo round the courts in recent times: FH Brundle v Perry [2014] EWHC 475 (IPEC) is an Intellectual Property Enterprise Court, England and Wales, ruling of Judge Hacon from 6 March and it addresses that minefield for unsuspecting patent-entitled litigants and their legal advisers -- liability for making groundless threats to sue someone for patent infringement. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 12:04 pm
So, we couldn’t let Throwback Thursday pass without mentioning Lonon v. [read post]
19 Oct 2016, 8:28 am
The guest post is reproduced below (with a few formatting changes).Govindswamy v. [read post]
10 Dec 2017, 11:47 am
State v. [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 5:00 pm
In this case, Kaley v. [read post]
13 Oct 2022, 3:29 am
Advance Magazine Publishers Inc. v. [read post]
31 May 2016, 6:22 am
, v. [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 5:14 am
Fiction: Foreigners can't win court cases in China.Fact: 90% of IP litigation in China is Chinese v Chinese. [read post]
