Search for: "Bear v. State" Results 4441 - 4460 of 14,845
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Feb 2011, 3:13 pm by A.J.B.
 The decisive difference between the two approaches is the burden of proof; according to the traditional view, the state that opposes another state’s jurisdictional assertion must prove the existence of a rule under international law prohibiting the assertion of criminal jurisdiction and according to the modern approach, by contrast, the state that asserts extraterritorial jurisdiction bears the burden of proof. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 9:53 am by Adam Feldman
United States, Merit Management Group v. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 7:32 pm by My name
    Moral hazard is when rational actors take bigger risks than they otherwise would, in the knowledge that someone else will bear the risk. [read post]
12 May 2014, 4:20 am by Terry Hart
(Or, as Lee Gesmer states it, “Filtration for interoperability should be performed ex ante, not ex post. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 4:01 am by Steven Gursten
Department of Transportation’s Office of Drug and Alcohol Policy and Compliance announced that truckers were prohibited from using “recreational marijuana”: “We want to make it perfectly clear that the state initiatives will have no bearing on the DOT’s regulated drug testing program. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 1:16 pm
Once this burden is discharged, if the record does in fact bear out that no genuine dispute exists, the burden then shifts to the non-moving party, who must set forth affirmative evidence and specific facts showing there is a genuine dispute on that issue. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 3:00 pm by Brad Dixon
To begin, the Ninth Circuit specifically concluded that the United States Supreme Court decision in NCAA v. [read post]
15 May 2014, 6:16 am by Amy Howe
” At her Angry Bear blog, Beverly Mann has two posts (here and here) on Town of Greece v. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 3:26 am by SHG
In 1974, the Supreme Court held in Geduldig v. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 1:11 am
The parties agreed to arbitrate any dispute over the "calculation" of Northland's earnings and "all issues having a bearing on such dispute. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 12:08 pm by LindaMBeale
  AT&T Mobility v Concepcion is only the latest foray in this direction. [read post]