Search for: "Bell v. Bell*"
Results 4441 - 4460
of 4,954
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jan 2012, 2:14 am
Alarm bells were ringing as the Sunday Telegraph reported student Abdullah Munawar’s appeal on human rights grounds against a refusal to grant him leave to stay in the UK, citing his playing cricket as a reason he had a private life under Article 8 of the ECHR. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 2:08 pm
In that decision, the Court extended the “plausibility test” first introduced two years earlier, in Bell Atlantic v. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 10:00 pm
The Justices have, however, permitted oral argument by an amicus that advocated an important position that a party did not, as in Pacific Bell Telephone Co. v. linkLine Communications (2008). [read post]
3 Jul 2006, 2:20 pm
Myers v. [read post]
16 May 2009, 9:03 am
" Erdman v. [read post]
6 May 2018, 7:45 pm
’ Santosky v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 10:56 am
A different result was reached in Enns Pontiac, Buick & GMC Truck v. [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 11:34 am
Toys R Us, Inc. and Taylor v. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 6:00 pm
McMahon (Internet Cases) US Trade Marks – Lawsuits and strategic steps Google – Google sued again for trade mark infringement in relation to AdWords program: Soaring Helmet v Leatherup.com (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) Psystar – Psystar owes Apple $75,000 while Apple moves to lift stay in dispute over unauthorised Mac clones (Ars Technica) [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 2:07 pm
In today’s case (Haczewski v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 10:53 am
v. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 7:53 am
Corp. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 10:44 am
In A.J. on behalf of J.J. v. [read post]
1 May 2023, 9:01 pm
Over the past several years, the use of non-disclosure agreements (“NDAs”) has received significant public scrutiny following their controversial use in a number of high profile harassment claims.[1] NDAs were back in the headlines earlier this year following the leak to the Telegraph of around 100,000 Whatsapp messages belonging to the former UK Health Secretary Matt Hancock.[2] The messages, which revealed Mr Hancock’s communications with other members of the government during… [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 10:01 am
The court in Katz relied on Bell v. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 4:53 am
(“Plattsburgh Taco”), owned a Taco Bell. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 12:05 am
In Huatai P&C Insurance Corp Ltd Shenzhen Branch v Clipper Chartering SA, the Maritime Court of Wuhan City granted the maritime injunction upon the claimant’s application to oblige the respondent to immediately withdraw the anti-suit injunction granted by the High Court of the Hong Kong SAR to restrain the Mainland proceedings. [7] The Hong Kong anti-suit injunction was successfully sought by the respondent on the grounds of the existence of a valid arbitration agreement. [8]… [read post]
25 Jan 2008, 2:07 am
Brain Injury Law Center, VA Michael V. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 2:00 am
Protecting computer programs under the Copyright Act: Dais Studios v Bullet Creative: (IP Down Under), Assessing copyright risk in new classroom technologies: (IP Down Under), Cadbury loses battle over exclusive use of colour purple for chocolate wrapping in its case against Darrell Lea: (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog), (IP Down Under), (IPKat), (IPwar’s), Employee or independent contractor? [read post]
17 Dec 2022, 4:40 am
Summary of the Fact This case concerned a class action initiated by a former employee, Morgan against Sundance Incorporate (the owner of a Taco Bell franchise restaurant, hereinafter “Company”) regarding the arrear of overtime payment in the context of Federal law of the USA. [read post]
